Hmm . . . suggestions on Chrysler fuel injection

[genesis!mvarc!an.bradford.ma.us!adh]

	Ed Lansinger <elansi01 at mpg.gmpt.gmeds.com> writes:
	
	I don't think there's enough meat in the cylinder walls to punch the
	block out to 2.5l.  If you're set on larger displacement, you might
	want to start with a 2.5l motor rather than your 2.2.

afaik, 2.2s and 2.5s had the same bore; -early- 2.5s had a taller
block than the 2.2s, -late- 2.5s shared the same block.  dunno the
crossover year though, but it suggests that the early 2.5 could be
stroked even bigger...

	An interesting idea would be to use the 2.5l turbo motor as your
	starting point.  You might want to remove the balance shafts to
	reduce inertia.

wouldn't you have to rebalance the engine afterwards?  of course, if
you were going to anyways...

_______________________________________________________________________________
Andrew Hay
	    LIFE, n: A phenomenon that resists the second law of thermodynamics
adh at an.bradford.ma.us						---Schroedinger