Multiprocessor system

Mark Boxsell mrb at mpx.com.au
Sat Feb 10 23:06:23 GMT 1996


At 02:12 PM 10/02/96 MDT, you wrote:
>
>> >Clint Corbin wrote:
>
>> That's the crux of the matter.  I want a fully sequential system.  The 68HC11
>> does not have enough output compare ports to control 8 fuel injectors in a
>> sequential system.  The software for the main modules would be pretty basic.
>
>Pardon my ignorance here, but what the heck do you need more than 1 output
>compare for?  You only have 1 cylinder firing at a time (except perhaps in
>exotic engines like the V12, I'm not familiar with these...) whether it's a 
>V8 or an inline 4... you only have to keep track of one injector on and off
>time at any given portion of the cycle.  Keep in mind that in an ECU, all
>things are RELATIVE with respect to timing, not ABSOLUTE.
>

>regards
>dn
>
>--
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Darrell A. Norquay              Internet: dn at dlogtech.cuc.ab.ca     
> Datalog Technology Inc.         Bang: calgary!debug!dlogtech!darrell
> Calgary, Alberta, Canada        Voice: +1 (403) 243-2220            
>                                 Fax:   +1 (403) 243-2872            
>    @ +                                                                
>     <                                                         
>    __/    "Absolutum Obsoletum" - If it works, it's obsolete    
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>

Darrell,
         I should point put that in a sequential system the injector pulses
can overlap as you go up the RPM range.
                regards,
                         Mark Boxsell
                         MRB Design




More information about the Diy_efi mailing list