O2 Sensor Open/Close Loop
Mazda Ebrahimi
kleenair at ix.netcom.com
Thu Nov 14 03:20:56 GMT 1996
RABBITT_Andrew at mv8.orbeng.com.au wrote:
>
> >The vehicle tested is a 1997 GMC 2500 P/U with a 5700 Vortec V-8. I
> >logged MAP, RPM, TPS (0= closed, 400= WOT), and O2 volts. You can
> >see the sensor voltage toggles all the way through WOT points.
>
> Interesting data there. A couple of questions though; you say 400 =
> WOT, but the maximum value is only 396. Is 400 the exact WOT
> breakpoint (in which case it never went into WOT mode) or is it
> something else? If so, do you know what it is?
>
> I noticed a lonely WOT flag at t=9.34 s, but not during the second
> tip-in. Is this your notation or from the ECU?
>
> I know that the EEC-4 delays open-loop operation for a few seconds
> after entering WOT mode. Might this be the case for GM, only longer?
>
> Andrew Rabbitt
Hi Andrew,
The system I used to log this data is a Compressed Natural Gas system
which piggy-backs the OEM computer. I ran the vehicle on gasoline, in
which case the natural gas system basically monitors various sensors
independant of the OEM.
I mentioned 400 is the maximum value possible. There is a calibration
process that I perform to let the natural gas system know what WOT
voltage is. going to 396 instead of 400 is simply a calibration error
on the natural gas system. I did have my foot all the way on the pedal.
Also, I added the WOT flag later to show a sample of the data. I guess
I should have added a second one for the second WOT region.
Regarding the delay in enrichment for WOT, that is an interesting point
which I will investigate tomorrow. I won't be surprised if that is the
case, because I have found many OEM strategies change as soon as you
exit the limits of the FTP-75 and I/M-240 test cycles.
More information about the Diy_efi
mailing list