Message not deliverable

Administrator Administrator_at_RAY__RMC__NAUTECH at ccmail.eo.ray.com
Thu Apr 3 08:02:51 GMT 1997


>The G60 uses MAP.  The idle and FT limits are wired in parallel, RPM is
used to determine witch limit is actuated.  Knock sensing and OXS are used.
The pot with the temp sensor is used for what VW calls CO adjustment, not
sure exactly how it all works.  The ISV (idle stabilizer valve) is used for
boost limiting.  Popular mods put a pressure switch in series with the ISV
to increase the limit or reroute the pluming for no limit.  Putting a
pressure switch in series also prohibits the ISV from stabilizing the idle.
This can be a problem in cold climates, OK for summer use.  Rerouting the
plumbing allows normal operation at idle and is not a problem at WOT
because, unlike a turbo,  the boost is primarily limited by the RPM of the
G-60 SC.
>
>Running without boost does not require chip changes.  I ran my G-60 for a
week without boost.  I made some "changes" and blew up some pluming between
the G-60 and intercooler.  You will loose about 100hp because of the low
compression.  Very slow, but runs fine.  Why do you want to do this??
>
>I have disassembled code in the digifant ECU.  Tables have been identified,
but I have not had time to comment any of the code. I can email this to you
if you are interested (185K).  The CPU is a motorola 68HC11.  Completely
different design than the Golf/Jetta digifant (8051 ???).

please send me your HC-11 code.

Thanks,

Tom Cloud <cloud at peaches.ph.utexas.edu>


Return-Path: <owner-diy_efi-outgoing at coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu>
Received: from gatekeeper.ray.com (gatekeeper.ray.com [138.125.160.10])
          by rdnetms1.eo.ray.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
      id VAA21427 for <barry_bridgman at ccmail.eo.ray.com>; Tue, 1 Apr 1997 21:25:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: (mailer at localhost) by gatekeeper.ray.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id VAA17174 for <barry_bridgman at ccmail.eo.ray.com>; Tue, 1 Apr 1997 21:26:05 -0500
Received: from coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu by gatekeeper.ray.com; Tue Apr  1 21:25:16 1997
Received: by coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI)
    for diy_efi-outgoing id AAA13550; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 00:28:12 GMT
Received: from smtp.utexas.edu by coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI)
    for <diy_efi at coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu> id TAA13545; Tue, 1 Apr 1997 19:28:08 -0500
Received: (qmail-queue invoked from smtpd); 2 Apr 1997 00:28:07 -0000
Received: from mail.utexas.edu (128.83.126.1)
  by smtp.utexas.edu with SMTP; 2 Apr 1997 00:28:07 -0000
Received: from ACC.austin.cc.tx.us (m198214180036.austin.cc.tx.us [198.214.180.36]) by mail.utexas.edu with SMTP id SAA09880 for <diy_efi at coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu>; Tue, 1 Apr 1997 18:28:06 -0600 (CST)
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 18:28:06 -0600 (CST)
Message-Id: <199704020028.SAA09880 at mail.utexas.edu>
X-Sender: cloud at peaches.ph.utexas.edu
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4
To: diy_efi at coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu
From: cloud at peaches.ph.utexas.edu (Tom Cloud)
Subject: RE: Volkswagen Digifant Injection 
Sender: owner-diy_efi at coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: diy_efi at coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu




More information about the Diy_efi mailing list