Radar Scrambling

[Dan J. Declerck]

On Apr 24,  3:19pm, John Hess wrote:
> Subject: RE: Radar Scrambling
> Lidar, of course, IS NOT Radar.
>
>
>
> ----------
> From:  FJB203 at aol.com[SMTP:FJB203 at aol.com]
> Sent:  Wednesday, April 23, 1997 6:33 PM
> To:  diy_efi at coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu
> Subject:  Re: Radar Scrambling
>
> In a message dated 97-04-23 18:00:35 EDT, you write:
>
> > Also Lidar's frequency is in the public domain, meaning you are allowed to
> jam
> >  it legally.
>
> According to the FCC, you are correct.  However to quote NY Law (for
> example):
>
> "Any device that alters, modifies, or transmit police radar signals" <snip>
> is illegal.

But, in legal terms, LIDAR is not RADAR.

-Dan


-- 
=> Dan DeClerck                        | EMAIL: declrckd at cig.mot.com      <=
=> Motorola Cellular CSD               |                                  <=
=>"The truth to CDMA... is spreading"  | Phone: (847) 632-4596            <=
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem/printer meets
the definition of a telephone fax machine. By Sec.227(b)(1)(C), it is
unlawful to send any unsolicited advertisement to such equipment.
By Sec.227(b)(3)(C), a violation of the aforementioned section is
punishable by action to recover actual monetary loss, or $500,
whichever is greater, for each violation.