Injector Options

[wstrass at eastman.com]

To: DIY     --INTERNET DIY

From: Wayne Strasser (CED)
_______________________________________________________________________
Subject: Injector Options

This note was orignally for CMW Racing, but my address for them is
apparently old and my message failed :(

Does anyone have any input?

_______________________________________________________________________
        Wayne Strasser
        Polymer Development
        wstrass at eastman.com
*** Forwarding note from XXXXXXXX--XXXXXXXX 08/07/97 09:02 ***
=========================================================================
Received: from eastman.com by GWVM1F.emn.com (IBM VM SMTP V2R4) with TCP;
   Thu, 07 Aug 97 09:02:35 TOD
Received: by eastman.com id AA29644
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for wstrass at eastman.com); Thu, 7 Aug 1997 09:02:29 -0400
Received: from gatekeeper.eastman.com by eastman.com with SMTP id AA37574
	(5.67b/SMI-4.1 for <wstrass at eastman.com>); Thu, 7 Aug 1997 09:00:59 -0400
Received: by gatekeeper.eastman.com; id JAA27456; Thu, 7 Aug 1997 09:30:31
-0400 (EDT)
Received: from coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu(128.146.90.150) by
gatekeeper.eastman.com via smap (3.2)
	id xma027245; Thu, 7 Aug 97 09:30:02 -0400
Received: by coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI)
	for diy_efi-outgoing id KAA17984; Thu, 7 Aug 1997 10:56:48 GMT
Received: from gatekeeper.eastman.com by coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu via ESMTP
(940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI)
	for <diy_efi at coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu> id GAA17979; Thu, 7 Aug 1997
06:56:45 -0400
Received: by gatekeeper.eastman.com; id HAA28335; Thu, 7 Aug 1997 07:25:42
-0400 (EDT)
Received: from emngw1.eastman.com(164.89.254.2) by gatekeeper.eastman.com via
smap (3.2)
	id xma028330; Thu, 7 Aug 97 07:25:35 -0400
Received: by eastman.com id AA39725
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for diy_efi%coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu at emngw1.eastman.com);
Thu, 7 Aug 1997 06:56:05 -0400
Received: from gwvm1f.emn.com by eastman.com with SMTP id AA21290
	(5.67b/SMI-4.1 for <diy_efi%coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu at emngw1.eastman.com>);
Thu, 7 Aug 1997 06:56:04 -0400
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 1997 06:56:04 -0400
From: wstrass at eastman.com
Message-Id: <199708071056.AA21290 at eastman.com>
Received: from GWVM1F.emn.com by GWVM1F.emn.com (IBM VM SMTP V2R4)
   with BSMTP id 0560; Thu, 07 Aug 97 06:56:08 TOD
Subject: Injector Options
Apparently-To: <cmwracin at ix.netcom.com>
Apparently-To: <diy_efi at coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu>
Sender: owner-diy_efi at coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: diy_efi at coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu

To: CMW     --INTERNET CMW
cc: DIY     --INTERNET DIY

From: Wayne Strasser (CED)
_______________________________________________________________________
Subject: Injector Options

I see from your web page that your company uses Bosch, Lucas, Roch., and Weber
injectors.  What are the relative advantages and disadvantages of each?

For my system in development (~30lb/hr), I have two major considerations:

1.  Fire every revolution up to 12,000 RPM
2.  MINIMAL power consumption by injector

Do I need a peak/hold or saturated circuit injector?  Which does your company
use and why?

Thanks.

_______________________________________________________________________
        Wayne Strasser
        Polymer Development
        wstrass at eastman.com