intake tuning
Jody Shapiro
jshapiro at bit-net.com
Wed May 14 17:57:33 GMT 1997
On Wed, 14 May 1997, Todd King wrote:
> <<<
> True, but wouldn't the output from a centrifugal supercharger or a turbo
> be much more turbulent than incoming air in a NA system?
> >>>
>
> I doubt it (intercooled turbo); I'm talking about air that has passed through
> some piping, through an intercooler, then through more piping and into the
> throttle body/manifold... How do you relate the turbulence level to the
> manifold tuning anyway?
I'll admit I'm thinking more of my actual situation - non-intercooled
supercharged V8. The tubing from the blower output is approx 2ft long. I
know you come from a turbo background and I'd agree that the air has a
chance to "stabilize" after going through the much longer tubing &
intercooler before it enters the TB.
As for how/why turbulence affects manifold tuning - I dunno; I'm not an
ME. I just have a big interest in cars and have taken an ME course in
automotive engineering and read a bunch of engine design books. I haven't
seen a lot of discussion on manifold design in my books nor here,
nevermind forced-induction manifold design. In summary - I have no idea.
I would just have though that the air coming out of a blower/turbo would
be fairly turbulent and that could disrupt the resonating column of air...
> Well for a properly sized turbo combination the full boost comes on at heavy
> throttle; doesn't have to wait for 6000 rpm!
Arright, so for a centrifugally supercharged application where boost
builds with RPM, now whaddya think? ;)
-Jody
--
97 Blue Z28 M6 (Memphis #1997)
Eibach's, !CAGS, !DRL, Crane HI-6, T-Rex, Kenny Brown SFC's,
MBA plate, 1LE shaft, Vortech 7lb S-Trim
To be installed: AutoMeter FP & Boost Gauges
Best ET (stock): 13.941/101.18 Best MPH: 13.999/101.61
http://www.bit-net.com/~jshapiro/z28/
More information about the Diy_efi
mailing list