Turbo Twos
FreshMar at aol.com
FreshMar at aol.com
Wed May 28 03:35:56 GMT 1997
From what I understand, two-strokes exhaust out one port half way down
the power stroke, then uncover the intake port farther down, letting in
the crankase- pressurised air, sworling in the opposite direction. The
flammable intake mixture stays out of the exhaust's way by the tuning of
the intake and exhaust ports (?). And the idea is to pressurize the
intake via turbo- or super- charging. My input/question is, would smaller
ports, meaning shorter in stroke, nearer to the bottom dead center of the
cylender do the trick? This would let the intake and exhaust interact for
less <time>, perhaps leading to less intake going out the exhaust. The
intake would need less time to fill the cylender, being more pressurized,
and the exhaust I suspect would be more pressurized as well. One problem
is of course is the less complete evacuation of exhaust gas near top of
cylender...
Idea 2; Turbocharging itself does not seem to suit this set-up, the
turbo would have to lag, and in doing so, it could only gain speed to
pressurize next stroke, delaying. What if you had a two cylender 2-stroke
twin turbo? Forgive me if this is old hat. Ultralight turbos could be
spun on #1's exhaust, pressurizeing the intake in #2's crankcase, which
is at its top, making available power 1/2 crank turn later. Ahh the bliss
of ignorance.
Mario T.
mailto:Freshmar at aol.com-----'76 VW Camper FI A/T,,'79 Fiat X1/9
More information about the Diy_efi
mailing list