GM ECU 1227730/47: basic questions
Kevin Vannorsdel
kv at us.ibm.com
Wed Nov 5 22:37:23 GMT 1997
Steve- Thanks for the info!
If the Howell setup is that much... why would you not want to investig=
ate
getting the whole thing (computer and all) from Holley? In other wor=
ds-
what does the Howell setup offer over going all Holley (besides being =
less DIY
(grin))? Maybe I better read that article!
The Edelbrock system is tempting- I agree! I am still investigating=
options
available from Turbo City for my K5 Blaze.
________________________________________________
Kevin Vannorsdel IBM Arm Electronics Development
408-256-6492 Tie 276-6492 kv at us.ibm.com
owner-diy_efi at coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu on 11/05/97 02:02:21 PM
Please respond to diy_efi at coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu
To: diy_efi at coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu
cc:
Subject: Re: GM ECU 1227730/47: basic questions
Kevin Vannorsdel wrote:
>
> Another entry level question...
>
> I am wondering why go with a Holley/Howell configuration instead of g=
etting
> something from say- Turbo City (Big TB and a GM computer) that seems =
cheaper
> and similar in performance (??) ?
>
> Also- please post what you learn from your questions with Howell (if =
you don't
> mind). Thanks!
>
> ________________________________________________
> Kevin Vannorsdel IBM Arm Electronics Development
> 408-256-6492 Tie 276-6492 kv at us.ibm.com
>
> owner-diy_efi at coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu on 11/05/97 07:14:48 AM
> Please respond to diy_efi at coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu @ internet
> To: diy_efi at coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu @ internet
> cc:
> Subject: Re: GM ECU 1227730/47: basic questions
>
> John Zarli wrote:
> >
> > sfg wrote:
> > >
> > > John Zarli wrote:
> > > >
> > > > sfg wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I am using the 1227730 ECU and have a few basic questions:
> > > > > 1. since it is so common, where might I find the disassembled=
code?
> > > > > (I'm using the EPROM 16139544 '87 K5 Blazer: manual trans,=
TBI)
> > > > > 2. Is the memcal a fuse-link type ROM?
> > > > > 3. Which application parameters are contained in the memcal?
> > > > > 4. I have noticed ref to a "P" suffix on the p/n. Meaning?
> > > > > 5. Is its driver circuitry capable of operating with the comb=
ined
> > > > > load of 8 injectors wired in parallel?
> > > > > 6. Will it run a ZZ4 GM engine (24502609) (with the 10185071
camshaft)?
> > > > > I know this is a lot of info, but since this ECU is so popula=
r,
answers
> > > > > may benefit many people on this list. TIA Steve
> > > > Steve, stay tuned....I should know #6, whether a TBI system can=
support
> > > > a ZZ3 (10185071) camshaft within a few weeks. roller rockers ar=
e going
> > > > in now. Almost done. Note that the alum heads on a complete zz=
3/zz4
> > > > engine are the old style bolt pattern....I've heard different o=
pinions
> > > > regarding enlarging the bolt holes on newer manifolds to fit th=
ose
> > > > heads.
> > > John, what are you using for injection? TBI or port? Enquiring mi=
nds
> > > need to know. Also, my GM service parts list (shows all the compo=
nents
> > > in a matrix for the ZZZ, ZZ1,2,3,&4) lists an intake manifold
> > > (10185063) as "dual bolt pattern" with EGR and applies to ZZ3 and=
> > > ZZ4 only. I'll stay tuned.... steve
> > Steve, visit the GMGOODWRENCH website & you can download the GM
> > Performance parts catalog (free). It has a wealth of info. The ZZ4 =
is a
> > great deal, but as it applies to newer engines...the dual bolt patt=
ern
> > is referring to the carb mounting. The intake manifold has an egr
> > passage but the heads do not (go figure?) Also the head to intake b=
olts
> > are old style, middle bolts on new manifolds are at a different ang=
le
Kevin,
re my phone call to Howell Engine Developments Inc (810-765-5100) today=
:
They said:
1. PROM, and Holley 4bbl TB *is* available w/o ECU; $600 for TB and $15=
0
for PROM. (ouch)
2. 215 deg duration, .5" lift cam is max for speed density system
(how does lift enter into this equation????) I didn't ask......
3. adaptor cable: Holley round-to-GM weather pak) is avail.
4. They thought Crane had a good roller cam to get the 235 deg dur-
ation of the ZZZ engine down to 215 deg. (Crane "CompuCam")
5. 7730 or 7747 ECU both OK to use.
6. use 55 lbs/hr injectors for small block
7. GM ECU drives the 4 Holley injectors directly w/o external stuff
BTW, I later found an article which features the same thing I'm
considering: Holley 4bbl TBI on a GM ZZZ 10134338 crate motor, using a
GM ECU! see "Popular Hotrodding" December, 1993. Article has good
detail.
Holley 4bbl TBI vs Edelbrock #3502 port injection:
I also visited the Summitt Racing (Akron, OH) retail store and put the
Holley 4bbl under scrutiny. The Edelbrock p/n 3502 was not in stock so
I couldn't see it.
the Holley TBI:
1. TPS is p/n 219R32A looks same as GM, w/weather pak connector
2. IAC is p/n 53030657 (a GM #???)
3. TB has built in thermistor (mounted in heat shrink)
4. has 3 vacuum ports: spark, full, and PCV
5. Holley ECU uses EEROM (if anyone is interested)
6. 3 CFMs avail: 650, 700, 900 (use the 900 on ZZZ??)
7. "fuel pressure: 15 psi" so said the flyer
the cost of the Howell stuff would be close to the Edelbrock #3502 PFI
system! Decisions decisions....!
Steve
=
More information about the Diy_efi
mailing list