Fuel Injection
Brian Knowles
briankk at aimnet.com
Sat Nov 29 00:59:41 GMT 1997
John Dammeyer asked:
>
>Would someone lay out the advantages/disadvantages of the following:
>
>Throttle Body Injection:
Advantages: All to the manufacturer. Cheap to make, uses same ol'
manifold.
Disavantages: One barrel carburetor. Uses same ol' manifold. May have
mandated non-performance enhancing electronics.
>
>Constant Flow, Multi-Port Injection
Advantages: Works just like Weber carbs, may need no electronics, none
of carb or TBI air/fuel manifold problems.
Disavantages: Hard to get for large displacement engines. Expensive.
Tuning mysterious and difficult. Some later systems have electronics,
not for performance but for smog nazis.
>
>Sequential Multi-Port Injection.
Advantages: Wide availability, junkyards full of 'em. Parts common and
relitvly cheap.
Disavantages: Most are smog control stuff that incidently lets the
engine run. Every manufacturer different. Unknown code and secret
parts, documentation marginal, source code propriatery. Good luck trying
to sort out actual engine managment from manufactures agenda, fed govt
agenda.
>Obviously each is more complicated and more expensive so that would be a
>down side but why go for something as complex as Sequential Multi-port when
>Constant flow would also work.
Yeah, thats the right question.
I really can't think of a reason to use EFI if mechanical injection is
available.
Brian
More information about the Diy_efi
mailing list