Wastegate mod.....
avos at cochlear.com.au
avos at cochlear.com.au
Mon Oct 13 23:01:33 GMT 1997
Simon, Robert,
In my experience, Electronic boost controllers (EBCs) can considerably
improve the boost curve of a car, but my experience revolves around
cars do not have the wastgate directly connected to boost pressure,
but instead have a solenoid in the line controlled by the ECU. Many
Japanese cars have this setup. The boost is controlled by the ECU
outputting a PWM waveform to the solenoid. Most ECUs that have this
setup do not have closed loop control, but instead calculate the pulse
width from the revs and throttle position. This setup means that if
exhaust/induction mods are made, the boost curve can change due to the
control system being open-loop. Also, atmospheric conditions can alter
the boost curve. Also most manufacturers will attempt to make the
power curve of the car come on smoothly for a 'refined feel', which is
not always optimal for the performance enthusiast who wants as much
power as possible at any operating point. The EBC improves the bottom
end boost of such cars, and also provides extremely accurate closed
loop control of an adjustable boost level. I admit that many cars with
an EBC can feel very peaky as torque can come on extremely quickly,
but this feels great, and as long as you stay in boost revs, it is
quite responsive.
For cars with the boost connected directly to the solenoid, EBC can
offer a few advantages- if the wastegate is not adjustable, it may be
the only means to alter the standard boost level, and a rise in boost
will give a good increase in power, and an EBC provides adjustable
boost, so it can be altered for various reasons from within the cabin
of the car (most of the time).
As far as what Robert mentioned about simple wastegate control
operating over a narrow boost range, well this may be the case, and
the boost curve may be close to optimal, I don't know. This is why it
would be good to see what the results of Simons project are. I am
interested to see if an increase in performance can be achieved
without adjusting the boost level, but instead just stopping any boost
getting to the wastegate at low boost levels.
Simons case is unique case as he wants to optimise the boost curve
without adjusting the maximum boost level. Most people who purchase
EBCs have the main aim of achieving higher boost, and the secondary
aims are to have adjustable boost from within the cabin and to have
the boost curve optimised. If you only want to optimise the boost
curve and forget the other advantages, perhaps an EBC is not the most
economical method, and as Robert said, perhaps there is no point in
changing the standard setup.
Regards,
Adrian
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Wastegate mod.....
Author: diy_efi at coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu at INTERNET
Date: 13/10/97 17:59
At 04:22 PM 10/13/97 +1300, you wrote:
>Hi All
>
>> Unfortunately its not (quite) a perfect world,
>
>;-) too true
>
>> and if you do not let
>> the pressure get to the wastegate a few psi before the set boost
>> level, you will find that boost may fluctuate (oscillate),
>
>This I know, so just to make sure I have this right your micro device is
going to
>do the same my compariter device, which is only open the wastegate at the last
>possible moment to achieve a stable boost set point.
>
>The 2 promo's of the boost controles I saw weren't very clear all they talked
>about was programmed boost control to achieve more power. All I'm trying to
find
>out is is the boost controlled just doing what I want to do?
>
>Cheers
>
>Simon
Adrian and Simon
I have been following your discussion and am confused. I understand that all
systems that use feedback may oscillate but why is it necessary to use an
electronic device to control the waste gate? Don't waste gates work by
simply applying boost pressure against a diaphragm to open a valve against
spring pressure? The greater the spring pressure the greater the amount of
boost required to unseat the valve and vent a portion of the exhaust,
thereby reducing the pressure driving the turbo?
As I understand it, when the force of the exhaust on the waste gate valve
plus the force of the boost pressure on the diaphragm equals the spring
force, there will be no seat pressure and a slight amount of exhaust will
leak past the waste gate valve. Additional boost pressure will compress the
spring lifting the valve off its seat. This will vent some of the exhaust
gases, reducing the amount of exhaust available to drive the turbo.
Depending upon the spring rate and the area of the diaphragm, an increase in
boost pressure of 1 psi could lift the valve 1/4 inch off its seat. (4 inch
diameter diaphragm and 50 lb/in spring rate) A 1 1/2 inch diameter valve 1/4
inch off its seat would vent quite a bit of exhaust. Thus, it would appear
that normal waste gates would control boost pressures over a fairly narrow
range and that until the boost pressure limit was reached all exhaust would
be forced to flow through the turbo. Am I missing something?
Robert
More information about the Diy_efi
mailing list