LT1, Crossfire, etc.., Intake runner lengths
Bruce Plecan
nacelp at bright.net
Sun Dec 13 05:42:10 GMT 1998
9's are a fast ride, and there is a time where ya gotta draw the line
for setup-tuning time, for that I'd think of a something like a Haltech
E6GM. While this is kinda a cop out, I just haven't got anytime at 8,500
with a gm ecm. The Haltech is designed for that. I could thou easily
picture a 808 prom code, double loaded in a 256K memcal in a 749 doing that
thou.
Would be fun thou
Bruce
>> I have been under the impression that long intake runners are for
>> low-end torque, and short runners are for high RPMs. What type of
project
>> are you considering? Maybe then we could get some folks to analysie it
in
>> greater detail.
>
>Yep, I was of the same understanding, just looking for RPM ranges.
> I bumped into an old racer buddy the other day and stopped
>by his garage. He's got a '68 Camaro drag car, 355 chev, .
>.700 lift roller cam, 850 holley carb, 13:1 comp, powerglide trans...
> He says there is no way a GM ECM system will replace his
>Holley & dual point dissy and still turn 9.90s...
>
>I told him to build a low comp shortblock and
>put some turbos on it with a milder cam, and the EFI will knock
>his socks off.. Their are 3.8 liter Buicks that weigh 1,000
>pounds more than his car, that earn quicker timeslips.
>He likes loud cars and hates my turbo talk..
>Gets upset when I call him a caveman..
>He is still considering a naturally aspirated EFI setup..
>His roller cam doesn't pull much vac at idle which has me a
>little hesitant to try a MAP system. Another concern is that
>his engine regularly sees 8500 RPM. I don't think that the
>GM ECM can do that. Not sure though..
>Thanks,
>Mike V
>
More information about the Diy_efi
mailing list