TYPE I / TYPE II DIS C3I MODULE WIRING
Shannen Durphey
shannen at mcn.net
Thu Feb 19 08:23:29 GMT 1998
--------------E3CFE3F9230C27B0AEB2AEEB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
TBK wrote:
> Thanks for the reply, Shannon! I found that sentence in
> the 1986 service manual. It appears that there are
> different versions of the Type I and Type II. Said another
> way, there are two styles of Type I and Type II. I need to
> get the part number from the pack and see if it is the
> compatable Type II with the stock Type I. Terry Kelley
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shannen Durphey <shannen at mcn.net>
> To: diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
> <diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu>
> Date: Wednesday, February 18, 1998 9:38 PM
> Subject: Re: TYPE I / TYPE II DIS C3I MODULE
> WIRING
>
> TBK wrote:
>
> > I have a VIN 3 3.8L Buick V6. It appears the
> > Type I C3I coil pack (opposite side output)
> > was swapped to a Type II (same side output) to
> > correct a miss in the engine.. Can someone
> > confirm, deny, or supply dis-information
> > regarding the wiring being different between
> > the two. I suspect the two can not be swapped
> > without changing the sensor, EST, bypass, etc
> > wiring. Drawing appear to show them as being
> > different. Are they direct swaps? True or
> > false. Terry Kelley
>
> From 1986 Olds Service manual:
>
> "Two style Module/Coil assemblies are used;
> 'TYPE I and TYPE II'. The wiring harness and
> sensors are interchangeable between both types."
>
> Digging further... it appears that the only
> difference is type I has a power wire in
> connector location P to power the coils, which
> type II does not use. Even looks like units can
> be interchanged between sequential fire and
> batch fire engines. Some wires are omitted in
> batch fire applications, mainly those for
> separate cam sensor. Diagnostic charts differ
> some also. I don't know what vehicle used the
> code "C" engine... what's year, make, model?
>
> Shannen
>
Yup. Went down and got 89 manual with VIN C engine, and
sho'nuff, they're different. Hmmm. Lessee, that hat's here
somewhere...
Shannen
--------------E3CFE3F9230C27B0AEB2AEEB
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<HTML>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF">
<P>TBK wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE> <FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>Thanks
for the reply, Shannon!</FONT></FONT> <FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>I
found that sentence in the 1986 service manual. It appears that there are
different versions of the Type I and Type II. Said another way, there are
two styles of Type I and Type II. I need to get the part number from the
pack and see if it is the compatable Type II with the stock Type I.</FONT></FONT> <FONT SIZE=-1>Terry
Kelley</FONT>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px"><B><FONT FACE="Arial"><FONT SIZE=-1>-----Original
Message-----</FONT></FONT></B>
<BR><FONT FACE="Arial"><FONT SIZE=-1><B>From: </B>Shannen Durphey <<A HREF="mailto:shannen at mcn.net">shannen at mcn.net</A>></FONT></FONT>
<BR><FONT FACE="Arial"><FONT SIZE=-1><B>To: </B><A HREF="mailto:diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu">diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu</A>
<<A HREF="mailto:diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu">diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu</A>></FONT></FONT>
<BR><FONT FACE="Arial"><FONT SIZE=-1><B>Date: </B>Wednesday, February 18,
1998 9:38 PM</FONT></FONT>
<BR><FONT FACE="Arial"><FONT SIZE=-1><B>Subject: </B>Re: TYPE I / TYPE
II DIS C3I MODULE WIRING</FONT></FONT>
<P>TBK wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE = CITE> <FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>I have
a VIN 3 3.8L Buick V6.</FONT></FONT> <FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>It
appears the Type I C3I coil pack (opposite side output) was swapped to
a Type II (same side output) to correct a miss in the engine..</FONT></FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>Can someone confirm, deny, or supply
dis-information regarding the wiring being different between the two.</FONT></FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>I suspect the two can not be swapped
without changing the sensor, EST, bypass, etc wiring.</FONT></FONT> <FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>Drawing
appear to show them as being different.</FONT></FONT> <FONT SIZE=-1>Are
they direct swaps?</FONT> <FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>True or false.</FONT></FONT>
<FONT SIZE=-1>Terry Kelley</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
From 1986 Olds Service manual:
<P>"Two style Module/Coil assemblies are used; 'TYPE I and TYPE II'.
The wiring harness and sensors are interchangeable between both types."
<P>Digging further... it appears that the only difference is type I has
a power wire in connector location P to power the coils, which type II
does not use. Even looks like units can be interchanged between sequential
fire and batch fire engines. Some wires are omitted in batch fire
applications, mainly those for separate cam sensor. Diagnostic charts
differ some also. I don't know what vehicle used the code "C"
engine... what's year, make, model?
<P>Shannen</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
Yup. Went down and got 89 manual with VIN C engine, and sho'nuff,
they're different. Hmmm. Lessee, that hat's here somewhere...
<P>Shannen
</BODY>
</HTML>
--------------E3CFE3F9230C27B0AEB2AEEB--
More information about the Diy_efi
mailing list