Dwell and HEI's
Clare Snyder
snyder at huron.net
Sat Feb 21 02:43:38 GMT 1998
bruce plecan wrote:
>
> Me thinks I might be able to shed a glimmer of light on something.
> After looking reading this thread, the coil is "on" for a time
> determined by a R/C timer, so the dwell looks to change as the
> rpm do, well ya, but the coil on time is the same it the matter of
> how many crank shaft degrees occur during this time that gives
> the illusion that something has changed.
> Bruce Murphys law may have started in 1949, with a rocket
> sled pilot, who made a run only to find out all the
> sensors were hooked up backward, Geeeeez
This is a good point. Untill the on time becomes so long there is not
enough off time for the field to collapse, you get the best possible
spark. On a point fired system, the on-time decreases with engine speed,
causing spark output to drop off at high speeds. The coil does not care
how fast the engine is firing - it takes the same length of time (within
limits) to saturate regardless of speed. If this is indeed the
situation, at low rpm we should expect the dwell reading on a meter or
scope to be quite low, and at high speeds relatively higher. This would
explain why higher primary current (lower resistance) coils are
generally used with HEI systems (current limited modules) The limited
current dtermines the maximum magnetic field strength which is lower
than it would be with a set of points driving the coil. With a short
dwell and this limited (relatively high)current, we still get an
incredibly hot spark at tick-over, which stays the same at max RPM.
--
_/\_
--|-----([])-----|--
S 0/ \0 B
Alls well that ends well!! www.snyder.on.ca is back
E-Mail service is back to normal
To avoid bouncing E-Mail messages
Reply to Clare at snyder.on.ca
OR
Remove the R from clsnyder in my E-Mail Address to reply. Stop the
spammers!!!
It's hard to soar like an eagle when your stuck with a bunch of
Turkeys!!!
More information about the Diy_efi
mailing list