Shannen Durphey wrote: > So, developement could be done with a 16183082, and when > calibration is complete the ECM could be swapped for the 808, > with the newer ECM retained for developement in the next project? > Shannen I would guess so - but why? What if you need to diagnose a problem later - out in the field? The diagnostic data would be a big plus to have IMHO... T.