FW: ION and EGOR again

garfield at pilgrimhouse.com garfield at pilgrimhouse.com
Wed Jun 24 17:53:21 GMT 1998


Got this from "Robert Harris" <bob at bobthecomputerguy.com> who hides
behind various labels, such as recently "Sanity Challenged". Hey Robert,
please DO post anything I sent you in private. I tried to be nice you
you; you pee'd all over me. Thas all that people are gonna see. Yeah,
post it all, please DO.

Gar


On Wed, 24 Jun 1998 09:43:20 -0700, "Robert Harris"
<bob at bobthecomputerguy.com> wrote:

>Want me to post this copy of the demand for a full data dump, spin
>meister???
>Shure sounds exactly like what I posted - oh high and mighty keeper of the
>great secret
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: garfield at pilgrimhouse.com [mailto:garfield at pilgrimhouse.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 1998 9:36 AM
>To: Robert Harris
>Subject: Re: ION and EGOR again
>
>
>On Wed, 3 Jun 1998 09:18:37 -0700, "Robert Harris"
><bob at bobthecomputerguy.com> wrote:
>
>>> >again - Screw them - I'm tired of SPF 1000 and crankiness.
>>>
>>> What's this SPF 1000 you keep refering to?
>>>
>>Sun Protection Factor (found on suntan lotion - big thing near beaches)
>>SPF1 - none SPF 15 total sun block   SPF 1000 - ground zero thermonuclear
>>weapon
>
>Hahahahaha. Only from you Bob, only from you. Hahahaha. I've never heard
>that expression before, but it's PERFECT. The chemical equivalent to the
>asbestos suit. Hee hee. Good one. OR, a treatment for the brain, which
>blocks out ALL light from entering the benighted cranium.
>
>>No problem with running them down and reading them - just knowing
>>***which*** ones.  Doing the original search to run them all down etc.
>>Seems I missed a few links. There is the Saab patent, but also references
>to
>>several (many) others keep coming up.
>>
>>Kind of like a list at the end of a chapter.  No explanation needed - heres
>>the reading list
>>type of thing.  What URL , what patent numbers, the URL just posted helps a
>>lot for example.
>>That sort of thing.  You know, like a score card - doesn't describe the
>>game - just where to find the vitals. News groups post a FAQ every couple
>of
>>weeks.  Maybe post a short - no explantion - reading list.  To ketch up to
>>ION read these first - thank you - sort of thing and bop it out whenever it
>>starts to get flakey.  That way we can all get on the same page.
>>
>>Riddled what the troops might need - without being a nanney???
>
>OK, point well taken. Now, once I post it, that means I have to post it
>ad nauseum after that? Hee. But OK, the info HAS dribbled out a bit; I
>can do that summary. You're right, I don't mind that, it's the nanny bit
>that irks me.
>
>>Plasma Jet Ignition
>
>Oh, golly, I just heard about this from another XAviation hack, who's a
>retired physics guy, and he's working on a patent for something he calls
>"puff plasma" IGN. A device for injecting a "puff" or "wiff" of plasma
>to ignite the mix. Sounds like Buck Rogers stuff to me! But I
>explicitely remember him saying to me with a twinkle in his eye that
>there's no "spark". Go figure?
>
>>CD fire's the plug, as soon as it conducts, dump one hell of a bunch of low
>>voltage 400 v or so capacitive discharge into the plug to get the plasma -
>>jet, then let the leeetle ladies 1 micro amp (guess where I got that
>number)
>>current flow thru the remnants.  So I guess that I will dig my way thru the
>>archives and get the patents list and see how to marry the two.  A side
>>effect of plasma-jet is much faster combustion - so less advance - fast
>burn
>>combustion - reduced knock.
>
>Huh, fascinating. Geez, where does it END??? YEEEHAAWWW!
>
>I wonder tho what putting that amount of energy into the cyl. thru the
>plug is gonna do to the poor ole pluggie? Maybe need some special kinda
>plug. I'll have to pump this friend of mine further about what he's up
>to, also. Vewy interwesting.
>
>>So as you see, I too am having fun.
>
>Well, YEAH, alright! If it were atoll an exclusive domain, man that
>would REALLY reduce the fun. In fact, as one of my mentors said once,
>there is NO conservation law for fun (meaning of course for some to have
>it, other's DON'T have to give it up). The "professor's" technoid way of
>saying people who get their fun at the expense of others are messin wiff
>Mutha Natecha, and better watch out! Heh.
>
>Gar
>




More information about the Diy_efi mailing list