67F687 chip

[Sandy]

I used to have all that somewhere, may even have it on disk with some
beginnings to clean / hack the hc11 assemble. Just may be a dead end.

Sandy

At 03:06 PM 3/21/98 -0900, you wrote:
>Mike -
>
>What documentation did you get with it? One thing I don't have
>yet is an "application note" or example system, or sample code,
>or whatever. Do you have such a thing?
>If so, any chance of getting copies, scanned in or whatever?
>
>Thanks - Ron Webb
>
>mike costa wrote:
>
>> The SSI Chip is still in production and some suppliers are
>> still able to get
>> them.  Unfornately TDK who now owns the sub division of SSI
>> that
>> manufactures the chip will not take on new distributors and
>> will only meet
>> demand produced by current distributors.  The chip is as good
>> as the data
>> sheet makes it out to be.  I'm currently constructing the SSI
>> evaluation EFI
>> system that they sold for $2500 to developers when the chip was
>> first
>> released.  It is not done as of this time, but I am aware of
>> others who have
>> used the chip with success. I will be happy to answer any other
>> questions
>> you may have on the chip, but I will admit I am far from an
>> expert on it.
>>
>> Mike Costa
>> Computer & Systems Engineering Undergrade - Rensselaer
>> Polytechnic Institute
>>
>> ----Original Message-----
>> From: Ron & Cathy Webb <rwebb at polarnet.com>
>> To: diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
>> <diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu>
>> Date: Saturday, March 21, 1998 6:00 PM
>> Subject: 67F687 chip
>>
>> >After you folks mentioned the Silicon Systems 67F687 Engine
>> >Interface Peripheral chip, I went looking on the web, and
>> found
>> >the Data sheet (QuestLink, 55 pages). There is also a supplier
>>
>> >listed, who swears he can get them.
>> >
>> >If anyone has any first hand experience with the things, I'd
>> be
>> >interested, because they sure look wunnerful so far! Looks
>> like
>> >one of these things, tied onto one of the $89 microcontroller
>> >boards I've been using, would just about make a complete
>> system,
>> >hardware wise.
>> >
>> >Anybody know for sure if they are vaporware? What's the catch
>> >here - this looks too easy!
>> >
>> >
>