Question for Oz members..1.8 Nissan Turbo

Niki Albury joelsmama at tpgi.com.au
Sat Nov 14 14:37:59 GMT 1998


SORRY but I must dissagree.......
A 108Kw version did come out in a FWD ......Auster 1800Xtt and had a 5
speed box but no intercooler.
in the RWD the CA18-DET the intercooled version is a 130Kw and the non
intercooled is a 108Kw.  The intercooled version intake is different to
the non intercooled as the non intercooled t/bodie faces over the rocker
cover and the intercooled version points to the front of the engine.

Im in the process of fitting a CA18-DET (with intercooler) to my
Nissan/Datsun 1200 Ute and had to do a little homework first.

I hope this helps

Justin

ECMnut at aol.com wrote:
> 
> In a message dated 11/13/98 2:42:01 AM Eastern Standard Time, DemonTSi at aol.com
> writes:
> 
> >
> >  Does anyone know if the FWD CA18DE available in 88-89 US Pulsar NXs have a
> >  similar block and head as the CA18DET? If so, then I'm assuming that you
> can
> >  use the FWD CA18DE in a RWD application by mating it up to a RWD CA18DE/T
> >  tranny...?
> >
> My Asian engine man said they are definitely different, when I suggeted
> the the turbo 1.8 came in a Turbo FWD, he said "no way, it's a RWD engine"..
> The heads and placement of motor mounts are usually different between FWD &
> RWD.  Sometimes  the head is the same.  Manuifolds are always different..
> HTH,
> MikeV



More information about the Diy_efi mailing list