Question for Oz members..1.8 Nissan Turbo
Niki Albury
joelsmama at tpgi.com.au
Sat Nov 14 14:37:59 GMT 1998
SORRY but I must dissagree.......
A 108Kw version did come out in a FWD ......Auster 1800Xtt and had a 5
speed box but no intercooler.
in the RWD the CA18-DET the intercooled version is a 130Kw and the non
intercooled is a 108Kw. The intercooled version intake is different to
the non intercooled as the non intercooled t/bodie faces over the rocker
cover and the intercooled version points to the front of the engine.
Im in the process of fitting a CA18-DET (with intercooler) to my
Nissan/Datsun 1200 Ute and had to do a little homework first.
I hope this helps
Justin
ECMnut at aol.com wrote:
>
> In a message dated 11/13/98 2:42:01 AM Eastern Standard Time, DemonTSi at aol.com
> writes:
>
> >
> > Does anyone know if the FWD CA18DE available in 88-89 US Pulsar NXs have a
> > similar block and head as the CA18DET? If so, then I'm assuming that you
> can
> > use the FWD CA18DE in a RWD application by mating it up to a RWD CA18DE/T
> > tranny...?
> >
> My Asian engine man said they are definitely different, when I suggeted
> the the turbo 1.8 came in a Turbo FWD, he said "no way, it's a RWD engine"..
> The heads and placement of motor mounts are usually different between FWD &
> RWD. Sometimes the head is the same. Manuifolds are always different..
> HTH,
> MikeV
More information about the Diy_efi
mailing list