Programming 101, NOT

Bruce Plecan nacelp at bright.net
Wed Oct 14 22:17:27 GMT 1998


-----Original Message-----
From: Roger Heflin <rah at horizon.hit.net>
To: DIY_EFI <diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu>
Date: Wednesday, October 14, 1998 12:32 PM
Subject: Re: Programming 101


Personally, if I was to do anything with the BL INt numbers it would be
tightening em up more that stock.
  Remember, depending on your ecm/program, the BL may be
applied to WOT.  Without a Wide Range O2, you may be flirtting
with danger.
  In the archives here there is lots spoken about the WOT + Learning
Mode, and all of it makes sense, so my feelings are that this is an
issue specific to program, about the WOT BL corrections.
  On the GNTTYPE Mail they had a patch to lock it at 128 for WOT.
Cheers
Bruce


>snipped+clipped
> does anyone know why they pick certain values for the min and
>max integrators, and for that matter min and max values for the
>block learns?  Is it just to keep things within where GM expects a
>stock vehicle to operate, and if so, on modified vehicles that need
>things a bit wider, is there any reason not to enlarge the range to >allow
things to work better?
> Roger
>
>




More information about the Diy_efi mailing list