Reversing the '8625

[Don.F.Broadus at ucm.com]

The cal pak is 8053 BJLA     PROM tag 4082/1618/1478   PROM part # 014/67633
date code B9407
Cal pak carrier # 68767-94059-3  The thick film # 1194068
                                                        Take care
                                                                   

	-----Original Message-----
	From:	Bruce Plecan [SMTP:nacelp at bright.net]
	Sent:	Monday, October 26, 1998 5:22 PM
	To:	diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
	Subject:	Re: Reversing the '8625


	-----Original Message-----
	From: Don.F.Broadus at ucm.com <Don.F.Broadus at ucm.com>
	To: diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
<diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu>
	Date: Monday, October 26, 1998 5:50 PM
	Subject: RE: Reversing the '8625


	It's not worth making that much of a project out of it, if it was
something
	easy
	to do that would be one thing, thanks for the offer thou.
	Good price on the ecm.
	Cheers
	Bruce

	>I have an old data I/O   29A  programmer. I could read the PROM and
burn
	one
	>and then send it to you in the mail
	>Since I don't have any way to print out the data.  I picked up the
16197427
	>at the local  U-Pull it for $20 .
	>
	>
	> -----Original Message-----
	> From: Bruce Plecan [SMTP:nacelp at bright.net]
	> Sent: Monday, October 26, 1998 1:37 PM
	> To: diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
	> Subject: Re: Reversing the '8625
	>
	>
	> -----Original Message-----
	> From: Don.F.Broadus at ucm.com <Don.F.Broadus at ucm.com>
	> To: diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
	><diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu>
	> Date: Monday, October 26, 1998 1:06 PM
	> Subject: RE: Reversing the '8625
	>
	> Long term probably more so.  Trouble is that the prom hasn't been
as
	>well
	> looked at as some of the other models.  That very well may be a
512K
	>prom.
	> The 747 is 32K.  So there is lots of room in it, trouble is lots
	>more to
	> unravel.
	> What did you give for it?.  Can you read the prom?.
	> Cheers
	> Bruce
	>
	>
	> >I found a 16197427 BJLA  in a 1994 Astro Van 4.3 L TBI this
	>weekend.  Is
	> >this ECM as versatile as the 747's  ?
	> >Thanks for your help.
	> >
	> >
	> >
	> >
	> >
	> >
	> >
	> > -----Original Message-----
	> > From: Mike Pitts [SMTP:mpitts at mail.emi.net]
	> > Sent: Monday, October 26, 1998 10:00 AM
	> > To: diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
	> > Subject: Re: Reversing the '8625
	> >
	> >
	> > Hi Shannen,
	> >
	> > I've been looking through my old e-mails and this one popped
	> > out at me. :)  You had listed the application for a BBNT/9734,
	> > but I think my cal is BBNT/9571.  Is there a listing for such?
	> >
	> > Thanks!
	> > -Mike
	> > ==========================================
	> > Mike Pitts
	> > Delray Beach, FL
	> > mpitts at emi.net
	> > http://www.emi.net/~mpitts/mike.htm
	> > ==========================================
	> > -----Original Message-----
	> > From: ShannenDurphey <shannen at mcn.net>
	> > To: diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
	> ><diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu>
	> > Date: Saturday, September 05, 1998 9:33 AM
	> > Subject: Re: Reversing the '8625
	> >
	> >
	> > >Nope.  BCC of BBNT/9734 fits 1993 s/t trucks, cpi. fed
emissions,
	> > >16156930ecm which was superceded to 16197427.
	> > >Sounds like you have my kind of luck.  That's the only 1993
4.3W
	> > >application which does not use the 8625 ECM.
	> > >BTW, I show that the 16168625 ecm is superceded to part no.
	> >16196395.
	> >
	> >
	>