Police / Taxi EFI
Bruce Plecan
nacelp at bright.net
Sun Apr 4 18:47:08 GMT 1999
----- Original Message -----
From: Fran and Bud <quest100 at gte.net>
To: <diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu>
Sent: Sunday, April 04, 1999 1:20 PM
Subject: Police / Taxi EFI
>From what I've heard/seen the pursuit packages are about a dead deal
anymore.
Last info I read about the cop packages was things like parking with the
nose of the car up by a wall, to test for air flow at sustained idle.
Some of the instrument clusters also had warnings like not to use OD at
sustained high speed.
In this day of litigation for a Police Dept to order a Pursuit Package
would be lawyer food.
So the best is, Fleet Service.
Some years ago some Police Depts had to lower the top speed mins, cause none
of the cars could pass it, with a light bar................ That also
explains some unmarked cars...
GM has spent a bunch of money PR'ing the Tahoe SUV as a Police Vehicle.
If anyone has more current info., or part #'s for Pursuit Package
calibrations, I'd like to hear about them.
Cheers
Bruce
> Since most of the discussions emphasize performance I thought that there
> would be more stuff based on police/taxi data, but have not seen anything
> posted and have not been able to find much in the archives. (Have not
looked
> at every post!) Also didnt see police entries on any of the ECM tables.
> One post from Bruce, sometime in the past, mentioned "cop car injectors
are
> larger than the truck. 1991, used 16136965 for the cop car ecm. BATJ was
a
> "good"cal.".
> That is all that I have found up till now. Does anyone out there have
more
> leads?
> My reasoning is that police cars involved in "hot pursuit" probably have
> hardware and calibrations to support running hard, or at least not hinder
> it. Isnt that the kind of EFI performance we are trying for?
> Where have I gone wrong? Where should I look harder? Interested in
> applications for both TBI and MPI.
> Thanks,
> Bud
More information about the Diy_efi
mailing list