Alternative engines
BUTLER, Tom
TEBUTLER at mccain.ca
Thu Apr 22 19:41:35 GMT 1999
The down side is that turbine engines are hugely fuel inefficient.
Tom
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ScottyCBoy at aol.com [SMTP:ScottyCBoy at aol.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 22, 1999 3:50 PM
> To: diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
> Subject: Alternative engines
>
> In addition to alternative fuels what about laternative power sources. I
> notices that an allison T63 turbine engine weighs about 150 lbs is about
> the
> size of a 50 lb fire extinguisher and puts out a whopping 317 HP!! A GE
> T-700
> which is a little shorter than a ford 5.0 engine cranks out 1,645 shaft
> horsepower!!!!!!!!!!!!!! These engines will run on just about any liquid
> that
> burns, such as diesel, unleaded, kerosene, and even used frying oil!. Has
> anyone comntemplated the pro's and cons from such a conversion? I know
> these
> engines can be found somewhat inexpensively from Government auctions..
>
> Scott
More information about the Diy_efi
mailing list