1.8 TBI and the 7747

[steve ravet]

"Stowe, Ted-SEA" wrote:
> 
> ok, but for a small 4 cyl, why would I want a 747 vs a 165 ?? I woudln't
> know which tables to modify etc. just curious, I'm just about ready to go
> out and find a 165 ecu.

Thanks to Bruce, the 747 is pretty well laid out on the WWW page.  Not
so for 165.  I'd like to use a 747 on my boat project but since it's 4
cyl I went with something else.

--steve


> 
> Ted Stowe
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: EFISYSTEMS at aol.com [SMTP:EFISYSTEMS at aol.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 1999 12:49 AM
> > To:   diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
> > Subject:      Re: 1.8 TBI and the 7747
> >
> > I hate to blow it for the rest of us that know but in a 747 and others
> > just
> > get a calpak from a 4 cyl(ex. S-10) and plug it in to a 747.....its just a
> > resistor network that gets the processor to understand the ticks while
> > cranking that it's a 4 cyl......then make sure you change the cyl select
> > in
> > the lookup tables so the "timing" is correct......blah blah and then some
> > -Carl Summers
> >
> > In a message dated 1/23/99 8:45:25 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> > nacelp at bright.net
> > writes:
> >
> > << Subj:       Re: 1.8 TBI and the 7747
> >  Date:        1/23/99 8:45:25 PM Pacific Standard Time
> >  From:        nacelp at bright.net (Bruce Plecan)
> >  Sender:      owner-diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
> >  Reply-to:    diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
> >  To:  diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
> >
> >
> >
> >  I knew, you knew that, well maybe a couple other guys,do
> >  Bruce
> >
> >
> >  >>  Oh, and what 4 cyl application used a 747?.
> >  >>  Bruce
> >  >None..
> >  >Mike V
> >
> >
> >   >>