555 EFI competition

[Garfield Willis]

On Fri, 30 Jun 2000 19:24:03 -0700, garwillis at msn.com (Garfield Willis)
wrote:

>... I'm not interested in reverse engineering
>something we have working in more simplified form already for XA. My
>interest was in showing that EVEN with some moderate *additional* stuff
>to take care of enrichment transients for autos, a perfectly driveable
>system CAN be put together for autos. Well, actually I was using
>BruceR's example as an existence proof that said had already been done.

Probly should clarify here, so the above doesn't sound so friggin
snooooty. The whole point about "showing that a perfectly driveable
system CAN be put together" wasn't to prove what everyone knows.
Obviously cars do run on EFI these days. Heh. The Grumpy Pelican and I
had been talkin bout how much fun/good it would be to build a totally
striped down and fundamental FI system to "exhibit" fundamental
relationships in FI, without the clutter of ECMs and tables, and STUFF.

I opined I thot it might be a really GOOD pedagogical exercise (for
EVERYONE, present company included) if we stripped down all our
ECM/algorithm crappola to the bare essentials, to see just WHAT was
required to make the car driveable.

Soooo, 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from diy_efi, send "unsubscribe diy_efi" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org