DIGI-EGOR ideas

[Bruce Plecan]

Have you been following along?.
Did you read the opening page of the WB diagrams?.
Their whole conversation, started based on understanding it.
Then shortly shifted to improving it.
Again, discussing and assuming things that may or may not be true.
Would prove alot more benificial, IMO, to get a *working* understanding of
the subject matter rather then guessing.

DIY implies a common denominator.
Meaning inclusive,  means building something that the average non EE guy can
build, designing something for 3 guys to use is defeating the DIY aspect of
it.
DIY,  means simple, and easy to impliment.
DIY_EFI, Do it Yourself electronic fuel injection,
would imply having just a basic grasp of harness repair, if you can do
harness work you can do DIY EGOR.  If you can show me where this digitial
one is going to be that way, I'm interested.
But again, that is building a house of cards, since other then extrapolated
data from DIY EGOR is what everything is being built on.  Again, if there is
a design flaw, it will just be included in the new version.
Not to be offensive, but again, common sense, gets lost around here easily.
Bruce

> Bruce Plecan wrote:
> > How about changing the subject line?.
> Done!
> > You also destroying the intent of using the DIY-EGOR diagrams.
> I think DIGI-EGOR (if I can be so bold as to suggest the name) is not
> the same as the project at http://diy-efi.org/diy_efi/projects/diy_egor/
> > why this reinventing of the wheel escapes me.
> From the DIY_EFI web site's home page:
>   The DIY-EFI list has been in existence since May 1994, and is for
>   discussion of all aspects of electronic fuel injection, engine
>   management, and related topics.
> Peter.
> PS. My intent is not to offend anyone, just to recall the basics.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from diy_efi, send "unsubscribe diy_efi" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org