DIY-GR ideas (was: No Subject)

[Seth]

Bruce- 

I didn't mean vaporware as in not existing. Sorry for the confusion, I
was having a difficult time finding the words to say what I meant. What
I meant was, there aren't many of these built (correct me if I am wrong)
and it seems everyone wants to add features. I never meant to imply that
it either didn't work or that there working units.

Sorry for the confusion!

Seth

Bruce Plecan wrote:
> 
> Seth:
> Drop by, and I'll show you one, in use.
> Not much more then vaporware,  get a grip.
> To bad you weren't at the Powwow, you could have seen it in use.
> It was run with a scope, in series with a NTK WB O2, and witnessed.
> The only thing that is a *not* about it is more people building them,  $30
> (max)(plus sensor) in parts and you could have one.
> There would probably be more being done if *we* had an interface for it.
> Maybe I am confused,
> Define Vaporware!.
> Bruce
> 
> > Bruce-
> > There are many times when I don't agree with you, but I have been
> > wondering myself about all the discussion on how to modify and improve
> > the DIY-EGOR, when it is still not much more than vaporware.
> >
> > -Seth Allen
> >
> > Bruce Plecan wrote:
> > >
> > > How about changing the subject line?.
> > > About now, all your really doinng is playing guessing games, and making
> > > things an nightmare for someone trying to research the archives.
> > >
> > > You also destroying the intent of using the DIY-EGOR diagrams.
> > > I was hoping there would be refinement of the project, instead it's
> becoming
> > > a coffe table discussion, of second guessing.  The hard part is done,
> why
> > > this reinventing of the wheel escapes me.
> > >
> > > Why not work on an ion detection system?.
> > >
> > > This is just basically repeating things all over again.
> > > I just feel like we could be going some where rather then an exercise in
> > > typing.
> > >
> > > Hell as it is there are only a few guys seemingly even using the plans,
> > > Don't mean to sound belittling, but golly trying to redesign something
> with
> > > out even trying it, means if there is a basic design flaw, then just
> coping
> > > it to a digitial design makes them both worthless.
> > >
> > > Hell rather then redesigning what's been done why not work on a display
> and
> > > interface to a 0-1 v output?.
> > > That is something critical to any design.
> > >
> > > Bruce
> > >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > > To unsubscribe from diy_efi, send "unsubscribe diy_efi" (without the
> quotes)
> > > in the body of a message (not the subject) to
> majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > To unsubscribe from diy_efi, send "unsubscribe diy_efi" (without the
> quotes)
> > in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org
> >
> >
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from diy_efi, send "unsubscribe diy_efi" (without the quotes)
> in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from diy_efi, send "unsubscribe diy_efi" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org