DDL (was: DIY-GOR ideas)

[944Technologist]

> From: "Bernd Felsche" <bernie at innovative.iinet.net.au>
>
> Sorry, but pulse-width modulation *is* a digital process if
> implemented like that. If you look at the circuit and try to
> understand how the thing is intended to function, you will see that
> the process of pulse-width modulation is entirely digital.

Wrong again Bernd. Pulse width modulation has been used in motor control and
radio circuits decades before the first computer. It is analog. Your just
digitally synthesizing an analog waveform.

> You seem to be making a religious issue out of thin air.

Bernd, if you quit writing me lengthy public postings, I would quit
answering them. You are perpetuating this.
My original comments were a reply to others that stated "digital would work
better", etc. I disagreed. It had nothing to do with your design. You made
it so. If you don't like the way the thread is going, stop writing.

FR Wilk

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from diy_efi, send "unsubscribe diy_efi" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org