RPM Monitoring
Moofaloof at aol.com
Moofaloof at aol.com
Tue Mar 20 22:52:37 GMT 2001
Hi Brian,
Your 4 position optical crank speed sensor is on the coarse side compared to today's systems in general but there is a wide variation. As an example that parallels your system, GM's LT1 engine has both coarse and fine optical measurements. The coarse wheel has 4 slots, the fine one has 360. Optical systems like this are rare with the majority of systems using VR or hall effect sensors working off a ferrous target. Most OEM systems fall somewhere within the above range in terms of resolution.
jc
-----------
I am a new member, and like you all must be, an automobile enthusiast. I am
currently going to school for Computer Science/Embedded Systems and did a
mock up Air/Fuel ratio monitor for a project a little while ago. The
project also included an RPM monitor which is what I would like to ask
about. I know that several systems monitor RPMs as a parameter for
adjustments, and I was wondering what the typical method used is. In my
mock up system, I actually simulated things using an electric motor, but I
was spinning it from about 5-10K RPMs. I machined a flywheel with 4 slots
at the 90 degree points to pass through an optical device and allow me to
measure the RPMs. I noticed that with the motor spinning that fast with 4
tics per revolution, I didn't get that great of resolution for the RPM
data. In an automotive application that typically hangs out in a lower RPM
range, are the RPMs taken from some kind of higher resolution crankshaft
position sensor or is the data acquired from the ignition system sufficient
to base adjustments on?
Best Regards,
Brian St. Jacques
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from diy_efi, send "unsubscribe diy_efi" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org
More information about the Diy_efi
mailing list