WB Display (was: Which WB O2 is Best??)

[Bruce]

You are less then clueless.
The agreement was for long term protection, of this and future projects.
It sounds like your one of the talkers, and not to be confused with a doer.
You just avoid any logic, and talk about maybes.  Rather then looking at the
facts of the matter.
Feel free to actually contribute something, more then hitting reply.
Bruce



----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Theurer" <habanero at us.ibm.com>
To: <diy_efi at diy-efi.org>
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 10:15 AM
Subject: Re: WB Display (was: Which WB O2 is Best??)


> I disagree.   He can redesign for a more generic device, or someone else
> could do the same.  I do not think the agreement restricts anyone from
> desiging a generic output device, that could work with WB-O2, even if they
> did injest the info about diy-wb.   The agreement you protect is a cancer,
> and the agreemnet, not people like peter, will kill it all.  The agreement
is
> so "borgish" that all newcomers that can actually contribute will not.
Your
> agreement will have the exact opposite effect that you intended.   What
will
> remain will be the original givers, and the rest takers.  No new givers
will
> come to the table, because the agreement is just insane.
>
> -Andrew
>
> On Monday 08 November 1999 09:15 pm, you wrote:
> > Trouble is he's already linked it to a furhter development of the
DIY-WB.
> > So what ever he does at this stage is violating the Users agreement.
> > His words, no one else's.
> > Anything he does now is just an attempt of circumventing his first
> > statement.
> > Bruce
> >
> > From: "Andrew Theurer" <habanero at us.ibm.com>
> > Subject: Re: WB Display (was: Which WB O2 is Best??)
> >
> > > > I won't be making the source code available until the DIY-WB
> > > > EULA is clarified to remove the suggestion that any artistic
> > > > work related to the DIY-WB becomes the property of anyone other
> > > > than the author of that work.
> > >
> > > Peter, may I suggest the following:
> > > If you are in support of a GPL type license, write your code with
> > > examples that show different voltage ranges that one could use, so
that
> > > the device
> >
> > is
> >
> > > designed to work with possibly many O2 sensors, or other sensors which
> > > report as voltage, and host it on another site licensed as GPL
> >
> > (sorceforge,
> >
> > > anywhere) and do not explicitly "submit" it to DIY_WB and its EULA.
> > > Then, users have the choice to use your contribution towards whatever
> >
> > application
> >
> > > they have, be it DIY_WB, MAP, whatever.   I think this would be a good
> >
> > start
> >
> > > towards a GPL efi type project.
> > > -Andrew
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> >- To unsubscribe from diy_efi, send "unsubscribe diy_efi" (without the
> > quotes) in the body of a message (not the subject) to
> > majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> To unsubscribe from diy_efi, send "unsubscribe diy_efi" (without the
quotes)
> in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from diy_efi, send "unsubscribe diy_efi" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org