Finished Archives
Bruce
nacelp at bright.net
Thu Oct 25 15:29:09 GMT 2001
Here is how the two styles of archives I've done so far.
I don't think looks are that important.
Just getting it to readable, and fairly compact is key here.
Dates are kinda open to me, you know the month and year from the file your
looking at. On the GMECM that I already have done it's one file to the
dates are intact.
Bruce
$From: jsg at jsgpc.mrcday.com
$Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 14:01:23 -0500
$Subject: test post 1
-<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>-
$Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1999 12:13:14 +0000
$From: steve ravet <steve.ravet at arm.com>
$Subject: first one!
I know, John said wait, but I wanted to have the first post in the
archive...
-<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>-
$From: "Bruce Plecan" <nacelp at bright.net>
$Subject: Re: first one!
$Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 13:28:53 -0500
Now that the ice is broken, I just gotta get in.
Since it might be easiest to nominate, and select at bin to work
on at this point, anyone got any nominees?.
-<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>-
$Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 13:39:17 -0500
$From: Pat Ford <pford at qnx.com>
$Subject: Re: first one!
On Thu, 4 Feb 1999, Bruce Plecan wrote:
hows about steve?? ( two firsts in a day 8*)
-<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>-
$Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 12:49:45 -0600 (CST)
$From: Roger Heflin <rah at horizon.hit.net>
$Subject: Re: first one!
On Thu, 4 Feb 1999, Bruce Plecan wrote:
I have the 93 Z28 A4 code, but I am sure most know that by now.
I figure I will finish it pretty soon (at least the important stuff),
From: Chris Howard <s2184002 at cse.unsw.edu.au>
>"Valve float is caused by resonance of the valve spring when it is
>excited at its natural frequency or a harmonic thereof."
>-Chris Howard
>I always thought it was the inertia of the lifter/valve/partial mass of
>the spring. In other words, the valve follows the correct path with
>respect to the cam until the region of the largest part of the cam lobe.
>But after that, the respective valve train components continue to travel
>(now in the wrong direction with respect to the cam) because the valve
>spring isn't strong enough to resist the inertia of the components.
Yes this is true. The valve spring must be strong enough to overcome the
inertia of the moving valve assembly. At high speeds the effective valve
spring force is reduced due to the phenomenon above. A obvious solution is
to increase the spring force but this increases the wear rate at the cam -
follower interface and indeed this can be a limiting factor as engine speeds
reach the stratosphere. For this reason, pneumatic valve springs allow lower
spring rates to be used for a given rpm ceiling, or alternatively allow
higher rpms to be used for a given allowable spring rate. I really should
have said valve float is indirectly caused by valve spring resonance. A
reference is an article in Racecar Engineering, Vol 3, No 4 Page 21.
From: Jens Knickmeyer <knick at ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
Subject: Re: VW Bosch injection
> VW has used several injection systems over the years:
Since last year, VW uses a Weber/Marelli system on the new 1.6l engine,
a Motronic on the new 1.4l. No idea why they use so many different
systems at a time...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from diy_efi, send "unsubscribe diy_efi" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org
More information about the Diy_efi
mailing list