[Diy_efi] Continuous VVT system
Adam Wade
espresso_doppio at yahoo.com
Fri Dec 19 16:17:06 GMT 2003
--- Alexei Pavlov <alexis.pavlov at st.com> wrote:
>> That would make good sense. I suspect the
>> controller used will need modification, if not
>> replacement.
> No except ignition, as it's a MAF/RPM system.
I meant the valve timing controller. I doubt they
used an infinitely-variable design architecture for
what is a binary system.
> You may find a Hall-effect sensor to be a more
> robust sensor for that application.
> The problem is to mount the magnet on the camshaft.
Is the car EFI already? If so, it may well have a
Hall effect sensor on the camshaft already, although
in many cases, it's a simple engine phase indicator,
rather than an angular indicator.
If it isn't, you may find that epoxy and some magnets
may give you the desired effect.
> I'm afraid if I do that steel pieces will stay on
> cams and destroy the cam/tappet surfaces,
I doubt you'd be using magnets powerful enough to do
that, even if ferrous particles were to make their way
to the top end. Hall-effect sensors have been used on
cams to detect engine phase for several decades witout
incident.
> while without magnets they are washed by the oil.
This is actually where Hall effect sensors show an
advantage over magnetic sensors. They are far less
snesitive to trigger-to-sensor distances than magnetic
sensors, making them ideal for locations where there
may be fairly dramatic thermal changes over time.
>> An infintely-variable system doesn't seem trivial
>> to me at all. I think you may be in for some real
>> mechanical engineering challenges.
> Mechanically it's not complexe, you just have to
> control the oil pressure in the VVT device.
I was more meaning adapting the cams, cylinder head,
and hardware on the vehicle now. Unless it has
infinitely-variable design cams already, that's a big
one. The Valvetronic system uses not only a different
cam timing, but a different duration as well,
necessitating very unusual-looking cam lobes that
change shape as the cams move laterally. It would
probably be easier to have infinitely variable
advance/retard. I'd be interested to see how much
difference that made in comparison to the Valvetronic
design. My own experience with cam timing tells me
that there's not a tremendous amount of power to be
gained from changing timing alone, in many cases.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
diy_efi mailing list
diy_efi at diy-efi.org
http://lists.diy-efi.org/mailman/listinfo/diy_efi
More information about the Diy_efi
mailing list