[Diy_efi] DIY-WB users - compare to high end

[Daniel R. Nicoson]

Bruce,

Were those changes in place in the summer of 2002 (when I built my unit)?

Also, I've got a 4-gas analyzer I got from a local shop.  Could you make use
of it (would you want to spend the time?) if I drop it off at your place
later this summer?  (Aren't you in northern IL?).

Thanks,

Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: diy_efi-bounces at diy-efi.org [mailto:diy_efi-bounces at diy-efi.org]On
Behalf Of bcroe at juno.com
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 12:30 AM
To: diy_efi at diy-efi.org
Subject: [Diy_efi] DIY-WB users - compare to high end


16 Jun 2004  "Milosz Kardasinski" <mxk0840 at rit.edu> writes:
> There have been comparisons made between the Dweebometer and
> commercial units and the general concensus is that the dweeb is
> lacking in transient conditions. It's steady state readings are
> close but not dead nuts, I think it's Bruce Roe who says "Don't
> expect it to be lab grade".

I'm thinking Bruce Plecan said that.  HOWEVER, you may recall
I did some work on the heater and sensing circuits of the DIY-WB.
The modifications I published here will clean up at least 90% of
the performance objections.  Without a multi gas calibration
process, it will never be accurate to as many decimal places
as one that spent the money.  But it is easily up to the job it
was intended to do; combined with the LED display, it's hard to
beat for transient situations.

Bruce Roe
_______________________________________________
diy_efi mailing list
diy_efi at diy-efi.org
http://lists.diy-efi.org/mailman/listinfo/diy_efi

_______________________________________________
diy_efi mailing list
diy_efi at diy-efi.org
http://lists.diy-efi.org/mailman/listinfo/diy_efi