[Diy_efi] wide band O2's

[Daniel R. Nicoson]

MessageI'll just throw in a general observation, analog isn't necessarily
less accurate than digital.  Most digital values are arrived at via analog
components (often built right into the processor itself).  Analog can often
be faster as well depending on the circuit.

The advantage of digital in a WB circuit would be if there is some real
signal processing going on.  It's very possible that many of these WB units
are simply reporting an analog signal with a digital display (no processing
at all).

Again, general observation because I don't pretend to know the guts of any
commercial WB units.  Remember that marketing types really do want to sell
their unit and will print...

Dan Nicoson

  -----Original Message-----
  From: diy_efi-bounces at diy-efi.org [mailto:diy_efi-bounces at diy-efi.org]On
Behalf Of gary
  Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 7:15 PM
  To: diy_efi at diy-efi.org
  Subject: Re: [Diy_efi] wide band O2's


  I thot digital was 'state of the art'.  Isn't PLX analog?
  I question the accuracy.

  GAS

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Brian McMahan
    To: diy_efi at diy-efi.org
    Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 10:42 AM
    Subject: RE: [Diy_efi] wide band O2's


    If you want state of the art you should try the PLX R-500
 It?s the

    best I?ve ever used.

    www.plxdevices.com



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.diy-efi.org/pipermail/diy_efi/attachments/20050705/0cc07d4b/attachment.html