More silly ideas,

Don.F.Broadus at ucm.com Don.F.Broadus at ucm.com
Thu Jun 3 17:49:30 GMT 1999


I would think a differential pressure transducer would work. High side
atmosphere/low side vac

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Dave Zug [SMTP:dzug at delanet.com]
> Sent:	Thursday, June 03, 1999 7:22 AM
> To:	gmecm at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
> Subject:	Re: More silly ideas, 
> 
> Manufacturers don't do that, (my guess) because it costs twelve 
> bucks, right? 
> 
> Seems someone could make a multi-MAP sensor that 
> toggled (xx-ms toggle) between 2 sets of sample tubes-- and add the 
> static reading to the manifold reading and put the signal out 
> as normal.. then it would be a single unit direct replacement.
> 
> the toggle obviously would have to happen between 2 sets of 
> electronic pressure transdiucer circuits, not 2 sets of tubes, or a 
> shock wave may interfere with the reading.. besides I don't think 
> theres a valve small or fast enough to actually switch between air 
> sources that fast.
> 
> I want to play this game too..  I have a good silly idea but I'll 
> wait for this thread to slow first.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > From:          Matt S Bower <m.s.bower at cummins.com>
> 
> > Sounds like a good idea to me.  Can't think of any reason why it
> > shouldn't work.
> > 
> Dave Z. www.delanet.com/~tgp



More information about the Gmecm mailing list