More silly ideas,
Don.F.Broadus at ucm.com
Don.F.Broadus at ucm.com
Thu Jun 3 17:49:30 GMT 1999
I would think a differential pressure transducer would work. High side
atmosphere/low side vac
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Zug [SMTP:dzug at delanet.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 03, 1999 7:22 AM
> To: gmecm at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
> Subject: Re: More silly ideas,
>
> Manufacturers don't do that, (my guess) because it costs twelve
> bucks, right?
>
> Seems someone could make a multi-MAP sensor that
> toggled (xx-ms toggle) between 2 sets of sample tubes-- and add the
> static reading to the manifold reading and put the signal out
> as normal.. then it would be a single unit direct replacement.
>
> the toggle obviously would have to happen between 2 sets of
> electronic pressure transdiucer circuits, not 2 sets of tubes, or a
> shock wave may interfere with the reading.. besides I don't think
> theres a valve small or fast enough to actually switch between air
> sources that fast.
>
> I want to play this game too.. I have a good silly idea but I'll
> wait for this thread to slow first.
>
>
>
>
> > From: Matt S Bower <m.s.bower at cummins.com>
>
> > Sounds like a good idea to me. Can't think of any reason why it
> > shouldn't work.
> >
> Dave Z. www.delanet.com/~tgp
More information about the Gmecm
mailing list