More silly ideas,
Matt S Bower
m.s.bower at cummins.com
Thu Jun 3 19:40:58 GMT 1999
Which is a guage type of sensor.
Don.F.Broadus at ucm.com wrote:
>
> I would think a differential pressure transducer would work. High side
> atmosphere/low side vac
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dave Zug [SMTP:dzug at delanet.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 03, 1999 7:22 AM
> > To: gmecm at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
> > Subject: Re: More silly ideas,
> >
> > Manufacturers don't do that, (my guess) because it costs twelve
> > bucks, right?
> >
> > Seems someone could make a multi-MAP sensor that
> > toggled (xx-ms toggle) between 2 sets of sample tubes-- and add the
> > static reading to the manifold reading and put the signal out
> > as normal.. then it would be a single unit direct replacement.
> >
> > the toggle obviously would have to happen between 2 sets of
> > electronic pressure transdiucer circuits, not 2 sets of tubes, or a
> > shock wave may interfere with the reading.. besides I don't think
> > theres a valve small or fast enough to actually switch between air
> > sources that fast.
> >
> > I want to play this game too.. I have a good silly idea but I'll
> > wait for this thread to slow first.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > From: Matt S Bower <m.s.bower at cummins.com>
> >
> > > Sounds like a good idea to me. Can't think of any reason why it
> > > shouldn't work.
> > >
> > Dave Z. www.delanet.com/~tgp
More information about the Gmecm
mailing list