howell chip problems

Bruce Plecan nacelp at bright.net
Fri Nov 19 20:33:55 GMT 1999


----- Original Message -----
Subject: howell chip problems

I've been really less then impressed with the folks I've talked to there.
If you have the injectors in series/parrarel, you have more problems then
you even know about.....
Grumpy


| Nope, I don't know what the difference is between computers but I had a
93,
| and now I have a 94.  Actually I still have the 93, and would love to be
able
| to send back the 94.
|
| No retard seen or detonation on top end pulls.  It just lays down if I put
in
| more than 12 deg initial.  Have to crank initial timing waaay up to get
| detonation.  I don't think advance is quite right.  troy says I have 36
deg.
| availible in the box.  With 8 inital that is 44 total - too much right.
But
| part throtlle reaction and gas mileage seem to be directly related to
timing.
|  What I have seen and used before indicates 12 initial 36-38 total is
right
| for iron heads, but more initial and less total at 33-34 for al heads.
|
| My scan tool will give real time TPS, MAP, BAR, RPM, Integrator, Blk lrn
| cell, Blk Lrn value, injector pulse width, timing retard, O2 values, just
| about everything except real time ignition advance - which I would really
| like.
|
| Would a heated O2 sesor be advised?  Do they go direct to 12V continuous
or
| is the heater modulated or timed.
|
| Thanks for your help folks - Ryan.
|




More information about the Gmecm mailing list