165 MAF and 808 MAP - differences for turbo apps?

[Bill Shaw]

My short term goal is installing the FI system I've bought for my Fiat 124 Spider.
I'm going to control it with an EFI332.  Next on my list is a GM supercharger.
Less
plumbing than a turbo.  It looks like the MAF from my 2.8 Camaro will work on the
SuperSpider. I'm also considering a GM 2 bar map,  so I'll be interested in hearing

comments on the subject.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Shaw
'78 FI Spider
(Will soon be) Fuel injected and stepping out over the line
http://www.connix.com/~bshaw/fiat.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------


Peter Gargano  wrote:

> Am I misguided in thinking I'll be better of with MAF for turbo?
>
> My own, longer term, EFI project is to turbo a 1500cc flat 4 Alfa (1980
> AlfaSud Sprint), using my own plumbing, and as much stuff from a VN or
> later model 3.8L V6 Holden Commodore as possible. (Well, the flat 4 is just
> like a Buick V6 really, 2 less pistons, 180 degree crank throws, cam
> belts, ...)
>
> The VN uses an 808 and a MAP system, the 165 is a MAF system. As far
> as I know, the ECUs are exactly the same (except the 808 doesn't have
> the 8192 baud driver/transciever chip). As I understand it, newer model
> Commodores use a MAF system, but with a different ECU (but not that
> different to the 808/165).
>
> So, should I be looking at using a MAF system for a turbo application?
> Or sticking with the MAP system? Either way, it seems the 808 will work,
> just need different code, and sensor(s).
>
> Anyone else doing anything like this?
>