Low temp thermostat
CSH-HQ
nacelp at jvlnet.com
Wed Oct 27 12:29:07 GMT 1999
Coolant had little to do with timing at 160-190
IAT had some fueling over it's range.
On the 730 I was working couldn't find any timing by CTS, or IAT changes.
This using Diacom, on the bench.
More to follow SOON.
Grumpy
>Hiya grump,
> ya oughta try and see what happens to the spark as well....temp does
>alot with IAT for spark and fuel....ttyl
>-Carl Summers
>
>
>In a message dated 10/26/99 10:03:52 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
>nacelp at jvlnet.com writes:
>
><< Date: 10/26/99 10:03:52 PM Pacific Daylight Time
> From: nacelp at jvlnet.com (CSH-HQ)
> Sender: owner-gmecm at esl.eng.ohio-state.edu
> Reply-to: gmecm at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
> To: gmecm at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu, gmecm at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
>
> Unless the AFR was corrected for the temp difference the testing was
> worthless. Period, 160 to 190 leans the motor by 6% inna 730 90 F-body as
> an example. So all they showed was the motor liked more fuel when cooler,
> whata shock...............
> If the dyno operator is a dodo, the results are worthless. Try reading the
> archives, I'm just tired of repeating the same thing week to week.
> Grumpy...
> >>
>
More information about the Gmecm
mailing list