Low temp thermostat

CSH-HQ nacelp at jvlnet.com
Wed Oct 27 12:29:07 GMT 1999


Coolant had little to do with timing at 160-190
IAT had some fueling over it's range.
On the 730 I  was working couldn't find any timing by CTS, or IAT changes.
This using Diacom, on the bench.
More to follow SOON.
Grumpy

>Hiya grump,
>       ya oughta try and see what happens to the spark as well....temp does 
>alot with IAT for spark and fuel....ttyl
>-Carl Summers
>
>
>In a message dated 10/26/99 10:03:52 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
>nacelp at jvlnet.com writes:
>
><< Date:    10/26/99 10:03:52 PM Pacific Daylight Time
> From:  nacelp at jvlnet.com (CSH-HQ)
> Sender:    owner-gmecm at esl.eng.ohio-state.edu
> Reply-to:  gmecm at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
> To:    gmecm at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu, gmecm at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
> 
> Unless the AFR was corrected for the temp difference the testing was 
> worthless.  Period, 160 to 190 leans the motor by 6% inna 730 90 F-body as 
> an example.  So all they showed was the motor liked more fuel when cooler,
> whata shock...............
>   If the dyno operator is a dodo, the results are worthless.  Try reading the
> archives, I'm just tired of repeating the same thing week to week.
> Grumpy...
>  >>
>




More information about the Gmecm mailing list