Injector Sizing, realistic goals, etc

[eclark at hoser.com]

Would the great vaults at CSH, HQ have any information on the
16159278.  Like table locations, etc..

- Eric

On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, CSH-HQ wrote:

> Remind me off list about your project when you see CSH, HQ open.
> I got some maps, inna poor format  that shoul interest you
> 
> 4 cyl that ecm, saturated or P+H, dependib on pin out.
> syty was saturated, sunbird P+H  Hence the difference in wiring
> Personally, I like turbos.
> Grumpy
> >>
> >>I don't think 900 hp is an unachievable goal.  I have a 500ci BB mopar
> >running
> >>530 hp and 600 ft lbs of tourque on the street with mild (.509" lift, 292
> >>duration) cam.  Agreed, 900hp is a far cry from that, but a 12-71 blower
> >would
> >>run all day at 7.5:1 and still go on pump gas.  Of course, all of the goodies
> >>like h-beam rods, billet cross bolted mains are necessary at that power
> >level,
> >>but it can be done on the street, I've seen it done
> >
> >	OK, reality check time here for me.  I am building a Toyota four-banger
> >for fun street use and abuse.  The motor is a Japanese-twincam-headed 3T-C,
> >which we saw in a popular Hemi version.  My goal is 300 streetable
> >horsepower via supercharging.
> >	So far I have aquired forged pistons, IR inlet manifold, Mikuni 44
> >sidedraft carbs (which I can apparently convert rather easily to throttle
> >bodies for EFI use), and an Eaton M-90 from a Thunderbird SuperCoupe.
> >HEAVY (maybe air/water) intercooling, boost timing retard, knock detection,
> >and possibly water injection are all in the cards for this engine.
> >	I realize that a 90-inch blower on a 113-inch engine is a bit silly, but
> >my options are pretty limited on my student budget, and I can sell the
> >blower if it absolutely won't work.  At this point I'm not terribly keen on
> >a turbo, despite the fact that it would be easier to size appropriately.
> >	GM-ECM content: so far it looks like the most convenient/appropriate
> >fueling solution would be the whole harness and ECU from a turbo
> >Sunbird/Grand Am....7749 if I recall correctly?
> >	
> >	GIVEN that other people's experience indicates these engines will easily
> >and reliably crank out 180-200 horsepower in NA form (on carbs, usually) -
> >	and GIVEN that turbo cousin-versions of this same engine have been
> >re-turbo'd to apparently reliable 300+ horsepower figures without even
> >getting inside the long block -
> >	and GIVEN that I know I will be losing several horsepower to parasitic
> >drag from the blower and belt drive -
> >	and GIVEN that I would rather boost the motor a bit more than spin it
> >(building for a safe 8000 RPM, camming for peak power no higher than 7500) -
> >
> >
> >	...does anyone have any words of advice, ridicule, or encouragement?  I'm
> >all ears.  I know better than to say without a doubt it is going to work
> >perfectly first time out, but I really do want to make this thing go.
> >
> >
> >
> >	Aaron Willis
> >	Garage TE51 International  http://surf.to/garage-te51
> >	ICQ # 27386985
> >	AOL IM: hemiyota
> >
>