MAF Signal Generator Misc MAF ????s

[CSH-HQ]

Seems like now, a translator would be doable to use the newer MAF on like a 
gn, or 86-89 f/y-body.  
  Yes, means a new calibration, but it would to do it right anyway.
Grumpy


>I'm not sure what you are trying to accomplish in this thread. I do have the
>Frequency VS Flow map for the LT1 MAF's. The Impala, Camaro, and L99 tables are
>different. These are the stock maps out of the PCM's. Below is a 95 F-body Map.
>
>		Ken
>---------------------------------------------------------
>
>"LT1 Edit Dump of Table -- MAF vs Frequency calibration
>
>
>
>Frequency	1488	1616	1744	1872	2000	2128	2256
>Flow Gm/sec	2.0	4.0	4.0	4.0	4.0	6.0	6.0
>
>
>Frequency	2384	2512	2640	2768	2896	3024	3152
>Flow Gms/sec	8.0	8.0	8.0	10.0	12.0	12.0	14.0
>
>Frequency	3280	3408	3536	3664	3792	3920	4048
>Flow Gms/sec	14.0	16.0	18.0	20.0	22.0	24.0	26.0
>
>Frequency	4176	4304	4432	4560	4688	4816	4944
>Flow Gms/sec	28.0	30.0	32.0	36.0	38.0	40.0	44.0
>
>Frequency	5072	5200	5328	5456	5584	5712	5840
>Flow Gms/sec	46.0	50.0	54.0	58.0	60.0	64.0	70.0
>
>Frequency	5968	6096	6224	6352	6480	6608	6736
>Flow Gms/sec	74.0	78.0	82.0	88.0	92.0	98.0	104.0
>
>Frequency	6864	6992	7120	7248	7376	7504	7632
>Flow Gms/sec	110.0	116.0	122.0	130.0	136.0	144.0	152.0
>
>Frequency	7760	7888	8016	8144	8272	8400	8528
>Flow Gms/sec	158.0	166.0	174.0	182.0	192.0	200.0	210.0
>
>Frequency	8656	8784	8912	9040	9168	9296	9424
>Flow Gms/sec	220.0	230.0	240.0	252.0	262.0	274.0	286.0
>
>Frequency	9552	9680	9808	9936	10064	10192	10320
>Flow Gms/sec	298.0	312.0	324.0	338.0	352.0	366.0	380.0
>
>Frequency	10448	10576	10704	10832	10960	11088	11216
>Flow Gms/sec	396.0	412.0	428.0	444.0	460.0	478.0	496.0
>
>			
>				
>"
>
>		Ken
>
>CSH-HQ wrote:
>> 
>> That's what I needed to know thanks..
>> Grumpy
>> 
>> >I can try diacom plus, when I pick up the '94 Trans Am I'm buying
>> >tomorrow.  Diacom is recommended for 94 and 95 on the fourth-gen list, so
>> >I think it does work with it.
>> >- Eric
>> >
>> >> 1994 was the first year for MAF and MAP. I don't think Diacom will work
>> >> with these but I have Tech 2 snapshots along with Autotap and Ease
>> >> snapshots of 1994 and newer vehicles with both MAF and MAP. E-mail me
>> >> directly and I can see what I can send you.
>> >>
>> >> >If so has anyone written down the MAF v vs MAP value(v), so that a 
relation
>> >> >ship from the two might be drawn?.
>> >>
>> >> Keep in mind that MAF versus MAP does not stay constant - it varies with
>> >> engine size, throttle body and other air intake restriction, intake
>> >> manifold design, camshaft, RPM etc...
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Jason
>> >>
>> >
>