Fuel injector Constant

Bruce Wilcox (EUS) EUSBEW at am1.ericsson.se
Thu Sep 9 16:53:48 GMT 1999


Thanks Matt,

My main point was that the injector Flow rate at whatever standard fuel
pressure did not match the equivalent value stored in the EPROM.

Best Regards,

Bruce Wilcox

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Matt S Bower [SMTP:m.s.bower at cummins.com]
> Sent:	Thursday, September 09, 1999 8:33 AM
> To:	gmecm at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
> Subject:	Re: Fuel injector Constant
> 
> >Did you take into effect that the two systems are supposed to have
> >different fuel pressure regulators.  Don't remember the number off the
> >top of my head but seems like the fuel pressure for one of the two
> >systems was higher than the rated flow benching which could account for
> >one.  It seems from memory that the other was the other way but I could
> >be wrong.
> 
> >Just a thought anyway.
> 
> >matt
> 
> "Bruce Wilcox (EUS)" wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Guys,
> > 
> > I looked at the fuel injector constants for various displacement 1987
> TPI
> > engines(1227165 ECU). The results are very interesting.
> > 
> > To my knowledge, the 87 350 injector should be 22 Lbs/Hr and the 87 305
> > injector should be 19 Lbs/Hr. Could someone verify these numbers???
> > 
> > The 350 injector constant stored in the EPROM translated to 23.09 Lbs/Hr
> and
> > the 305 injector constant translates to 20.86 Lbs/Hr. Does anyone have
> an
> > idea why the discrepancy exists??
> > 
> > Thanks and Best Regards,
> > 
> > Bruce Wilcox



More information about the Gmecm mailing list