ECM interchangability?
Ludis Langens
ludis at cruzers.com
Sun Jul 2 10:33:12 GMT 2000
Daniel Houlton wrote:
>
> I have
> verified through various web pages that the 2.8, the 3.1 and
> possibly the 3.4 SOHC use the 1227727 ECM, but that the 3.4
> DOHC uses the 16149396 PCM (up until '94 at least).
No such thing as a SOHC 3.4. The only choices are the pushrod 3.4 or
the DOHC 3.4.
> It also says that these two are identical hardware wise except
> for the addition of an SRAM chip on the PCM used in controlling
> the transmission.
The extra SRAM doesn't directly have anything to do with the
transmission. The ECM puts it's processor stack in that memory.
> I don't want or need
> the transmission control in my application.
There exist factory calibrations for the 3.4 DOHC with a manual
transmission using the 16149396 ECM.
> The real reason
> though is that I want to be able to tune the ECM and I believe
> (but haven't verified yet), that the Kalmaker software can be
> used with the 1227727 ECM to modify / tune it, but likely not
> with the 16149396 PCM the DOHC engine uses.
There are lots of different software versions for the 1227727. Some
support a TBI 4-banger. Others are for a port injected V8. You need to
specify the software version running in the ECM. For an incomplete list
of your choices, look here:
http://www.cruzers.com/~ludis/idxref.html
--
Ludis Langens ludis (at) cruzers (dot) com
Mac, Fiero, & engine controller goodies: http://www.cruzers.com/~ludis/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org
More information about the Gmecm
mailing list