2.8v6 tpi and a 730
Ernst denBroeder
edenbroe at cisco.com
Wed Jul 19 14:03:41 GMT 2000
At 04:07 PM 7/18/00 -0800, you wrote:
>Which V6 MPFI intakes did you get? I assume you got the Gen I because
Yup... Gen I intakes.
>the Gen II's won't mate to the iron heads. (The aluminum Gen II heads
>have a different shape.) Your TBI engine has the iron heads. There are
>actually also two versions of the iron heads - small valve and big
I have the big valve heads. I had to remove the heads when I installed the
headers (broken bolts). So..... I couldn't very well re-install them
without pocket porting them first. That would be a waste of power! :)
>Gen I MPFIs use a dizzy. You might be better off converting to a
>complete Gen I (C3 ECM) system rather than trying to rig a '730. For
>Gen I, your ECM choices are the 1226870 ('85) and 1227302 ('86-'89) if
>you want to use MAF. If you want MAP, use a 1226869 or 1227170. For
>the former pair, you could start with a stock Camaro calibration, the
>latter, a Fiero cal. TK's GMEPro supports the latter.
Thanks for the info tip on the Fiero/GMEPro pairing. I want to use
MAP. Other then the added complexity, is there any other reason not to
consider the 730? I picked the 730 because I wanted to learn it... I'm not
married to it.
>If you examine GM's 2.8 MPFI engine lineup in the late '80's, you'll
>notice that the higher output applications retained the iron head Gen I
>design. This is despite the theoretically better canted valves of the
>aluminum Gen II heads.
I think even the 3.4 RWD crate motor retains the Gen I head...
Ernst
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org
More information about the Gmecm
mailing list