Sensor response times; was 89 F-body ECU

[Thomas Matthews]

I grabbed one of those small IAT sensors too. It was out of the airbox of an
88 Quad 4, and the sensor side was smaller than an SMD cap. But it looked
factory.
I thought I would try it in place of my 89 OEM TPI sensor, which is encased
in brass. Haven't tested it yet though.
Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scot Sealander" <Sealand at clarityconnect.com>
To: <gmecm at diy-efi.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2000 1:34 PM
Subject: Re: Sensor response times; was 89 F-body ECU


> nacelp wrote:
>
> > Has any one tried comparing CTS/IAT/MAT/TTS response times?.
>
> Not yet.  But one day while looking for sensors at the junkward,
> I came across what must be an aftermarket air temp sensor.
> It was made a little different from the GM sensors.  It reads
> the same, but has a very small element for the thermister.
>
> Now I am assuming that the small element means less thermal
> mass (faster response), but I may be wrong....
>
> Just have to test some.
>
> Scot Sealander
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
> in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org
>
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org