First GN chip
nacelp
nacelp at bright.net
Sun Mar 26 04:02:12 GMT 2000
Kinda making a word game of it.
If you start with alot and take some out that is retarding.
If you refer to having added timing, then yes it was advanced.
Either way as air temp rises, you'll want to lessen the total amount of
timing.
Les Grumpy
> Air temp isnt a retard table, its an advance table. I guess you could
merely
> start with a lower than normal timing map and advance at lower temps. As
you
> reach higher temps the value would fall back to the original lower than
> normal value. Did that even make sense? ie: 100% load table might be:
> 2400 RPm and up... 23 25 24 23 23 22 20 19
> but using IAT might be 22 23 22 21 21 20 20 17
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org
More information about the Gmecm
mailing list