Calculating VE from MAF and MAP sensors
Bruce Plecan
nacelp at bright.net
Tue Oct 3 01:56:31 GMT 2000
Test drive a stock one, record as many grm/sec vs rpm/MAP locations as
possible.
Drive modified car record the same areas.
% change in MAF, gives % change needed for MAP.
Prolly too easy..
Be interesting to figure injector gm/sec, and amount of fuel used, as
compared to air consumed and see how the commanded AFR line up with actual,
and then use a WB to see how everything really lines up.
Jus sounds interesting to me
Bruce
> We have been talking about this on the LT1 edit mailing list, but
> thought I would ask you all to see what opinions you have, since
> there is probably much more experience here.
> On LT1's we have MAF and MAP sensors, and have been trying
> to use them to calculate a better VE for modified setups.
> Here is our logic -
> VE = actual airflow / theoretical airflow.
> Theoretical airflow = Rpm / (2(rev/intake cycle) * 60 sec/min) *
displacement
> = RPM * 5.733 / (2 * 60) in L/sec
> then using the ideal gas law to get mass from liters
> PV=nRT
> n/V=P/(R*T) use R = 0.287 kJ/(K*g) (kJ = kPa * L)
> density = P / (287 * T(K))
> Pressure would be equal to the MAP reading (so we get VE at part
> as well as WOT where MAP ~ BARO)
> Theoretical massflow = RPM * 5.733 * MAP / (0.287 * T(K) * 2 * 60)
> units in g/sec
> Then actual massflow can be taken straight off the Mass Air meter in
g/s
> so then it's just actual / theoretical * 100 %.
> Assuming enough samples are taken, and all the VE's are averaged
together,
> should this be a reliable way to get close to the actual VE for a
modified setup,
> and any flaws/corrections in the reasoning?
> A spreadsheet implimenting this is at
> http://www.baylor.edu/~Christopher_Bennight/files/VECalc.zip
> Thanks,
> Chris Bennight
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org
More information about the Gmecm
mailing list