Fuel Econ and Hiway Mode
Tedscj at aol.com
Tedscj at aol.com
Fri Oct 13 03:57:19 GMT 2000
OOPS,
read down a little farther and realized the matter was already cleared up.
Sorry!
In a message dated 10/12/00 11:50:27 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Tedscj at aol.com
writes:
> > >I don't think he was implying that inert gasses aren't compressible,
> > >just that...more gas volume (but not more petrol) + same cylinder
volume
>
> =
> > >higher compression=better efficiency. (of course, that's assuming
all
> > >other
> > >things being equal...which they never are!)
> >
> > Are you thinking that the EGR is in addition to the regular charge via
> > pressure or something? EGR replaces an equal volume of charge. I
don't
> see
> >
> > any change in pressure. I stand by my very-small-rocks theory.
> >
> > Jeremy
>
> No, you're missing it...
> A given volume of petrol/air PLUS an additional volume of inert gas will
> yield higher pressure (once compressed to a fixed volume) than just the
> original volume of petrol/air. Higher pressures extract more power from
the
>
> same mass of petrol/air, thus are more efficient. The inert gas doesn't
> need
> to be non-compressable or force-fed... Simply inducted as it normally is.
> The other side of the coin is that the inert gasses lower the charge temp.
> (after it's in the chamber, by absorbing heat) thus LOWERING efficiency in
> that way (lowering the temp REDUCES the pressure). Which factor governs,
I
> don't know.
> Of course, maybe I'M missing something being as I only took one semester
of
> physics in college, a long time ago ;)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org
More information about the Gmecm
mailing list