Part Throttle tuning for MAF (was MAF tables have a max of 255)

[JN]

Never saw programming 808.  Where is it?  I would assume that is not
practical since so many here have switched to a 730 in lieu of the 165.
Jason
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Plecan" <nacelp at bright.net>
To: <gmecm at diy-efi.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: Part Throttle tuning for MAF (was MAF tables have a max of 255)


> Programming 808 covered that, and yes
> Bruce
>
> > What?  The 165 has the ability to use a MAP instead of a MAF?
> >
> > Jason
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Daniel Collins" <bossute at one.net.au>
> > To: <gmecm at diy-efi.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 10:28 AM
> > Subject: Re: Part Throttle tuning for MAF (was MAF tables have a max of
> 255)
> >
> >
> > > Why not use the 165 in MAP mode rather rather than MAF works real well
> > here
> > > in Australia 95% of our GM's are map
> > >
> > > Just a thought
> > >
> > > Daniel Collins
> > > bossute at one.net.au
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Marteney, Steven J. <smarteney at xlvision.com>
> > > To: gmecm at diy-efi.org <gmecm at diy-efi.org>
> > > Date: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 9:57 PM
> > > Subject: RE: Part Throttle tuning for MAF (was MAF tables have a max
of
> > 255)
> > >
> > >
> > > >For me, it wasn't a matter of what was simpler, more eloquent, more
> > > >accurate, ...  The simple truth I've encountered is the 730, 747, and
> > many
> > > >other ECMs (and more specifically those code sets that run speed
> density)
> > > >are more "hacked."  There is more info about them and more tunable
> > > >parameters identified and clearly explained.  Since I don't have the
> time
> > > or
> > > >desire (lean toward the desire part) to hack the 165 MAF code, I'm in
> the
> > > >process of gathering the necessary parts to switch.
> > > >
> > > >IMHO, Steve
> > > >
> > > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > > >> From: "JN" <jwn at sgi.net>
> > > >> To: <gmecm at diy-efi.org>
> > > >> Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 10:58 AM
> > > >> Subject: Re: Part Throttle tuning for MAF (was MAF tables have a
max
> of
> > > >255)
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> > Really?  Isn't a bigger headache to switch to a 730?  Maybe I am
a
> > bit
> > > >> naive
> > > >> > but it seems that 165 MAF ecm is fairly simple.  Right now my
goal
> is
> > > to
> > > >> get
> > > >> > it close and not perfect.  Since I know nothing about speed
> density,
> > I
> > > >> plan
> > > >> > to stick with the MAF.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Jason Norris
> > >
> >
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > -
> > > >To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the
> quotes)
> > > >in the body of a message (not the subject) to
> majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --
> > > To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the
quotes)
> > > in the body of a message (not the subject) to
> majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
> > in the body of a message (not the subject) to
majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
> in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org