humid is better in turbines
rahmrh at cableone.net
rahmrh at cableone.net
Thu Aug 23 18:44:16 GMT 2001
Only if you put lots of water into the compressor, at little
bit is only just a bit corrosive (it is bad on the life of
a steam turbine to get too much liquid water droplets into
the turbine). I expect in a heavy rain quite a bit of water gets fairly far into the engine, probably even into
the combustion chamber, even given the compression of
turbine's I suspect that alot of the liquid may still
be liquid even given the temp rise just from the increase
in pressure keeping it liquid. I also expect that the water injection in this sort of system would be high pressure straight into the combustion chamber bypassing the turbine compressor parts.
Roger
-----Original Message-----
From: "owner-gmecm at diy-efi.org" <owner-gmecm at diy-efi.org> on behalf of "jll at edge.net" <jll at edge.net>
Sent: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 09:18:05 -600
To: "gmecm at diy-efi.org" <gmecm at diy-efi.org>
Subject: Re: humid is better in turbines
I sure hope that the liquid is being flashed off as a gas vapor prior to entering
the combustion chamber. Positive displacement gas compressors tend to come apart
when an incompressible liquid is introduced into the compression chamber.
JL
>KasaRyan at aol.com wrote:
>>
>> Whoo Whee! opened up a can o worms on this one!
>>
>> Ok, one of the reasons I put in the explaination I did was that I knew that
>> some early jet aircraft, the 707 among them, would dump hundreds of gallons
>> of water into the combustion chambers of the engines on takeoff. This
>> probably lowered the temp slightly, but more importantly dramatically
>> increased the volume of what was coming out the back of the engine, and also
>> pushing on the turbine to compress more air. The more force you chuck out
>> the back, the more the plane goes forward! Sir Issac had that one down,
as
>> far as Harry ricardo goes, I dont have his book on combustion chamber design,
>> but I do believe he plugged away at it for a while.
>>
>> Roger, you seem to have the thermo book handy, so I would like this
>> calculated. If you have one gram(or cc) of water at 100C, and you add enough
>> energy to vaporize it into gas, how much energy does this take, and at 1
ATM,
>> how much volume does it take up once vaporization is complete? If you take
1
>> cc of air at 100C, and you add the same amount of energy, is the resulting
>> volume increase more or less than for the water which goes thru the state
>> change. (IS this PV=nRT? or something of that sort)
>>
>> I believe I was wrong on the water being in a liquid form on a humid day,
but
>> what if you use injection, and have liquid water in the combustion chamber.
>>
>> If this goes on too long, i will probably have to dust off the books and
look
>> it up myself.
>>
>You might need to, I won't be able to run the numbers until tonight.
>
>I believe you have 2 test cases, all closed systems, I don't believe
>humidity enterns in to it as water vapor acts as an ideal gas.
>
> case #1: 1 mole an ideal gas at 50C with xx joules then
> added to it what is the ending pressure.
> case #2: 1 mole (minus a small amount for the water) of an ideal
> gas and 1 mole of water (18ml) at 50C with xx joules added
> to it, what is the ending pressure?
>
>I suspect strongly case #2 (same physical volume starting) will produce
>a higher ending pressure, this requires that you get the water into the
>combustion chamer as a liquid, and then add enough energy to convert it
>to an ideal gas. If it goes inth the combustion chamber as a gas, it
>will act pretty much like an ideal gas, and no gain is made, and also it
>would have displaced some oxygen coming in so reduced the amount of energy
>that you could add to things. I am pretty sure the Harrier jets do
>this trick also to increase thrust, though only for short periods of time,
>I suspect that the water is weight inefficient so you don't want to use
>it for long times (only use to hover (harrier) and takeoff and other
>emergencies).
>
> Roger
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
>in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org
>
>
http://netwinsite.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org
More information about the Gmecm
mailing list