BLM Cells for $88
Scot Sealander
Sealand at clarityconnect.com
Tue Jun 26 01:27:46 GMT 2001
Squash wrote:
> Doesn't the BLM account for loss of engine efficiency?
Over the life time of an engine, sure. I think we are saying the same
thing here, that BLM is for correction, not tuning.
> Maybe efficiency changes dramatically enough at different cell boundaries that it
> warrants having different cells?
Why would efficiency change dramatically at a cell boundary?
I imagine that a cam going flat would really lose efficiency at higher
RPMs, but are we going to keep running an engine with a flat cam? Are
we going to tune to that condition?
> Why did GM love them so much?
And why did they also use so few? Anyway, not a question for me to try
and answer....
> Some TBI truck 350's have 32 cells, some 4. Why the difference on almost the same
> engine?
I have seen cell blocks duplicated for CannPurge and non-CanPurge
operation. You would really have to know the problem that the code
writer was trying to solve.
Scot Sealander
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org
More information about the Gmecm
mailing list